+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn

+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Quantum chemical studies of structures and binding in noncanonical RNA base pairs: the trans Watson-Crick:Watson-Crick family



Quantum chemical studies of structures and binding in noncanonical RNA base pairs: the trans Watson-Crick:Watson-Crick family



Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 25(6): 709-732



The trans Watson-Crick/Watson-Crick family of base pairs represent a geometric class that play important structural and possible functional roles in the ribosome, tRNA, and other functional RNA molecules. They nucleate base triplets and quartets, participate as loop closing terminal base pairs in hair pin motifs and are also responsible for several tertiary interactions that enable sequentially distant regions to interact with each other in RNA molecules. Eleven representative examples spanning nine systems belonging to this geometric family of RNA base pairs, having widely different occurrence statistics in the PDB database, were studied at the HF/6-31G (d, p) level using Morokuma decomposition, Atoms in Molecules as well as Natural Bond Orbital methods in the optimized gas phase geometries and in their crystal structure geometries, respectively. The BSSE and deformation energy corrected interaction energy values for the optimized geometries are compared with the corresponding values in the crystal geometries of the base pairs. For non protonated base pairs in their optimized geometry, these values ranged from -8.19 kcal/mol to -21.84 kcal/mol and compared favorably with those of canonical base pairs. The interaction energies of these base pairs, in their respective crystal geometries, were, however, lesser to varying extents and in one case, that of A:A W:W trans, it was actually found to be positive. The variation in RMSD between the two geometries was also large and ranged from 0.32-2.19 A. Our analysis shows that the hydrogen bonding characteristics and interaction energies obtained, correlated with the nature and type of hydrogen bonds between base pairs; but the occurrence frequencies, interaction energies, and geometric variabilities were conspicuous by the absence of any apparent correlation. Instead, the nature of local interaction energy hyperspace of different base pairs as inferred from the degree of their respective geometric variability could be correlated with the identities of free and bound hydrogen bond donor/acceptor groups present in interacting bases in conjunction with their tertiary and neighboring group interaction potentials in the global context. It also suggests that the concept of isostericity alone may not always determine covariation potentials for base pairs, particularly for those which may be important for RNA dynamics. These considerations are more important than the absolute values of the interaction energies in their respective optimized geometries in rationalizing their occurrences in functional RNAs. They highlight the importance of revising some of the existing DNA based structure analysis approaches and may have significant implications for RNA structure and dynamics, especially in the context of structure prediction algorithms.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055325993

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18399704

DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2008.10507216


Related references

Non-Watson-Crick base pairing in RNA. quantum chemical analysis of the cis Watson-Crick/sugar edge base pair family. Journal of Physical Chemistry. a 109(10): 2292-2301, 2006

Frequency and effect of the binding of Mg2+, Mn2+, and Co2+ ions on the guanine base in Watson-Crick and reverse Watson-Crick base pairs. Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 113(47): 15670-8, 2010

Stabilization of Watson-Crick base pairs of DNA by protonation: Quantum-chemical study. Biopolimery i Kletka 18(3): 258-261, May-June, 2002

Principles of RNA base pairing: structures and energies of the trans Watson-Crick/sugar edge base pairs. Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 109(22): 11399-11410, 2006

An innate twist between Crick's wobble and Watson-Crick base pairs. Rna 19(8): 1038-1053, 2013

Ab-initio quantum mechanical calculations of NMR chemical shifts in nucleic acid constituents. I. The Watson-Crick base pairs. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2(1): 233-248, 1984

Theoretical study of the scalar coupling constants across the noncovalent contacts in RNA base pairs: the cis- and trans-watson-crick/sugar edge base pair family. Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 111(36): 10813-10824, 2007

Parallel-stranded DNA with trans-Crick-Watson base pairs. Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology 5: 25-38, 1991

Structures and stabilities of small DNA dumbbells with Watson-Crick and Hoogsteen base pairs. Chembiochem 4(7): 623-632, 2003

Geometries and energies of Watson-Crick base pairs in oligonucleotide crystal structures. General Physiology and Biophysics 12(5): 401-419, 1993

DNA with Parallel Strand Orientation: A Nanometer Distance Study with Spin Labels in the Watson-Crick and the Reverse Watson-Crick Double Helix. Journal of Physical Chemistry. B 119(43): 13593-9, 2016

Under what conditions does G.C Watson-Crick DNA base pair acquire all four configurations characteristic for A.T Watson-Crick DNA base pair?. Ukrains'kyi Biokhimichnyi Zhurnal 85(4): 98-103, 2014

On how Watson and Crick discovered what Watson and Crick had suggested: the "folk" concept of discovery rediscovered. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 30(1): 7-30, 2009

On How Watson and Crick Discovered what Watson and Crick had Suggested: The "Folk" Concept of Discovery Rediscovered. History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences 30(1): 7-30, 2008

Similar binding of the carcinostatic drugs cis-[Pt(NH3)2Cl2] and [Ru(NH3)5Cl] Cl2 to tRNAphe and a comparison with the binding of the inactive trans-[Pt(NH3)2Cl2] complex - reluctance in binding to Watson-Crick base pairs within double helix. Nucleic Acids Research 11(18): 6571-6586, 1983