+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

RAC reviews: are you ready?

RAC reviews: are you ready?

Revenue-Cycle Strategist 5(7): 1-3

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 055332692

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18720642

Related references

Systematic mixed-methods reviews are not ready to be assessed with the available tools. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64(8): 926-928, 2011

All in the Family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more. Systematic Reviews 4: 183, 2015

Interpreting systematic reviews: are we ready to make our own conclusions? A cross-sectional study. Bmc Medicine 9: 30, 2011

Systematic reviews, overviews of reviews and comparative effectiveness reviews: a discussion of approaches to knowledge synthesis. Evidence-Based Child Health 9(2): 486-494, 2014

Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62(10): 1021-1030, 2009

COX-2 gene expression and methylation profile in Sapajus apella as an experimental model for gastric adenocarcinoma. Genetics and Molecular Biology 41(2): 496-501, 2018

Early Drain Amylase Value Predicts the Occurrence of Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of Surgery 266(6): E79-E80, 2017

Performance reviews. Subjective assessment of the past gives way formance reviews because it allows to IT-facilitated guidance. Healthcare Informatics 22(7): 43, 2005

Cochrane reviews v industry supported meta-analyses: we should read all reviews with caution. Bmj 333(7574): 916, 2006

Reviews of acupuncture for chronic neck pain: pitfalls in conducting systematic reviews. Rheumatology 41(11): 1224-1231, 2002

Empty reviews: a description and consideration of Cochrane systematic reviews with no included studies. Plos one 7(5): E36626, 2012

Achieving change in primary care--causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews. Implementation Science 11: 40, 2016

Development of Microemulsions and Microemulgels for Enhancing Transdermal Delivery of Kaempferia parviflora Extract. Aaps Pharmscitech 19(5): 2058-2067, 2018

Reviewing the Reviews: Examining Similarities and Differences Between Federally Funded Evidence Reviews. Evaluation Review 41(3): 183-211, 2017

Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation Biology 29(6): 1596-1605, 2015