EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses



RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses



Bmc Medicine 11(): 21-21



There is growing interest in realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example, by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. No previous publication standards exist for reporting realist syntheses. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. The project's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for realist systematic reviews. We (a) collated and summarized existing literature on the principles of good practice in realist syntheses; (b) considered the extent to which these principles had been followed by published syntheses, thereby identifying how rigor may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; (c) used a three-round online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of national and international experts in evidence synthesis, realist research, policy and/or publishing to produce and iteratively refine a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; (d) provided real-time support to ongoing realist syntheses and the open-access RAMESES online discussion list so as to capture problems and questions as they arose; and (e) synthesized expert input, evidence syntheses and real-time problem analysis into a definitive set of standards. We identified 35 published realist syntheses, provided real-time support to 9 on-going syntheses and captured questions raised in the RAMESES discussion list. Through analysis and discussion within the project team, we summarized the published literature and common questions and challenges into briefing materials for the Delphi panel, comprising 37 members. Within three rounds this panel had reached consensus on 19 key publication standards, with an overall response rate of 91%. This project used multiple sources to develop and draw together evidence and expertise in realist synthesis. For each item we have included an explanation for why it is important and guidance on how it might be reported. Realist synthesis is a relatively new method for evidence synthesis and as experience and methodological developments occur, we anticipate that these standards will evolve to reflect further methodological developments. We hope that these standards will act as a resource that will contribute to improving the reporting of realist syntheses.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055333084

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23360677

DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21



Related references

RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. Bmc Medicine 14(1): 96-96, 2016

Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES). Bmc Medical Research Methodology 11(): 115-115, 2011

Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation. Bmj Open 5(8): E008567-E008567, 2016

RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. Bmc Medicine 11(): 20-20, 2013

Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal. Bmc Medicine 11: 22-22, 2013

The rameses algorithm for multiple equilibria-III Acceleration and standardized formation constants (RAMESES II). Talanta 37(4): 425-429, 1990

The RAMESES algorithm for multiple equilibria-IV. Strategies for improvement (RAMESES III). Talanta 38(8): 875-888, 1991

Standards for authorship and publication in academic radiology. AUR Ad Hoc Committee on standards for the responsible conduct of research. Investigative Radiology 28(10): 879-881, 1993

Standards for authorship and publication in academic radiology. Association of University Radiologists Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for the Responsible Conduct of Research. Radiology 189(1): 33-34, 1993

Amniotic Band Syndrome: A Review of 2 Cases. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2018

Biomarker development study publication standards are dead-long live biomarker development study publication standards!. Cancer Informatics 2: 1-2, 2007

Improving skills and care standards in the support workforce for older people: a realist review. Bmj Open 4(5): E005356-E005356, 2014

The scientific publication and its critical reading. Standards for the publication of a scientific article. The impact factor. Nefrologia 20 Suppl 6: 29-33, 2001

The visualizable, the representable and the inconceivable: realist and non-realist mathematical models in physics and beyond. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 374(2058): -, 2015

Elaborating the Context-Mechanism-Outcome configuration CMOc in realist evaluation A critical realist perspective. Evaluation 19(2): 141-154, 2013