EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

RANZCR 2006 peer review audit instrument



RANZCR 2006 peer review audit instrument



Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 52(4): 403-413



The Royal Australian and New Zealand College Radiologists (RANZCR) continuing professional development programme incorporates audit with feedback as one important activity. The 2004 audit tool improves radiation oncologist practice quality; however, the instrument is designed to be regularly refined. To refine the 2004 audit tool and present the new instrument we incorporated comments and suggestions from: (i) the auditor and radiation oncologist from the single machine unit trial; (ii) members of RANZCR Post-Fellowship Education Committee; (iii) New South Wales Department of Health mandatory prescription requirements; and (iv) the International Atomic Energy Agency audit tool. In July 2006, the revised instrument was designed then endorsed by Post-Fellowship Education Committee. Important changes include: (i) combining criteria which separately scored documentation and correctness for similar items; (ii) scoring treatment schedule more explicitly; (iii) separating target volume coverage and critical structure dose; (iv) altering performance criteria scoring to be sensitive to peer review when no consensus can be reached; and (v) strengthening instructions for use and notes to improve comprehension and acceptance. The refined 2006 instrument should be more user-friendly while increasing its usefulness.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055333253

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18811766

DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2008.01939.x



Related references

The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit?. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13(3): 352-357, 2007

First CytoJournal Peer-Reviewer's Retreat in 2006 - open access, peer-review, and impact factor. Cytojournal 3: 5-5, 2006

Audit of demand for after-hours CT scanning services in RANZCR-accredited training departments. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 60(1): 35-41; Quiz 41-6, 2015

Audit of peer review. Medical Journal of Australia 1(5): 237-238, 1980

An audit of prescribing by peer review. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 28(194): 525-530, 1978

Utilization review, medical audit, and peer review. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 12(2): 57-58, 1974

Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation. Quality Assurance and Utilization Review 1(3): 83-90, 1986

Audit, peer review, and intellectual conformity. Lancet 338(8770): 822-823, 1991

Peer review audit in occupational medicine. Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine 40(3): 87-88, 1990

Caesarean section audit by peer review. European Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology. 48(1): 9-14, 1993

A comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed radiation oncology practice audit instruments: how does reproducibility affect future approaches to revalidation?. Australasian Radiology 48(2): 195-203, 2004

Audit: a project on peer review in general practice. Family Practice 2(4): 219-224, 1985

Peer review record audit by optometry students. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics 59(10): 56P, 1982

Medical audit or peer review in Australian hospitals. World Medical Journal 26(3): 45-48, 1979

The nursing care audit--a tool for peer review. Supervisor Nurse 5(2): 20-28, 1974