+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Radical cystectomy - pro laparoscopic



Radical cystectomy - pro laparoscopic



Der Urologe. Ausg. a 51(5): 671-678



Although the technical feasibility of laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) has been proven and the procedure has been accepted in the EAU guidelines 2011 as a valid alternative, its actual position has to be determined. On the one hand the advantages of LRC (less blood loss, lower transfusion rates, shorter analgesia time) have been proven in retrospective studies; however, the technical difficulties of purely laparoscopic urinary diversion result in very long operating times and in cases of a laparoscopic-assisted creation of a neobladder, the question of the advantage of this approach remains doubtful. Despite case reports of port metastases and peritoneal carcinosis following laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy, there is no difference in terms of oncological long-term data (up to 10 years) between laparoscopy and open surgery performed at centres of excellence. Evidently, the curative options for the patients do not depend on the type of surgery (open versus minimally invasive) but on the efficacy of adjuvant treatment strategies (polychemotherapy). Currently it is believed that LRC should be considered for patients with low risk of progression (pT1-2). The final position of laparoscopic radical cystectomy can only be evaluated in a multicentric randomized controlled trial.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055345757

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22532364

DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-2863-0


Related references

What about conventional laparoscopic radical cystectomy? Cost-analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Journal of Endourology 28(4): 410-415, 2014

Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. European Urology 67(6): 1042-1050, 2016

Re: Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. European Urology 69(5): 963-964, 2016

Comparative analysis of outcomes and costs following open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. European Urology 61(6): 1239-1244, 2012

Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic radical cystectomy: comparison to open radical cystectomy. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Urology 101(6): 721-725, 2011

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with enteric urinary diversion. Alternative to open cystectomy?. Chirurgia 100(1): 41-46, 2005

The oncologic results of laparoscopic radical cystectomy are not (yet) equivalent to open cystectomy. Current Opinion in Urology 19(5): 522-526, 2009

Perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic radical cystectomy: "pure laparoscopic" and "open-assisted laparoscopic" approaches. Urology 70(5): 910-915, 2007

Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy Versus Extraperitoneal Radical Cystectomy: Is the Extraperitoneal Technique Rewarding?. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 13(4): E271-E277, 2016

Laparoscopic urinary diversion after laparoscopic radical cystectomy and complex pelvic surgery. Journal of Urology 169(4 Supplement): 63, April, 2003

Lower extremity neuropathy after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy. Canadian Journal of Urology 17(5): 5390-5393, 2011

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Arab Journal of Urology 10(1): 40-45, 2012

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Urologic Clinics of North America 35(3): 455-66, Viii-Ix, 2008

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Current Urology Reports 6(2): 106-108, 2005