+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution using ileum



Radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution using ileum



Korean Journal of Urology 52(4): 233-240



Over the past decade, continent urinary diversion, especially orthotopic bladder substitutions, has become increasingly popular following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. The ultimate goal of orthotopic bladder substitution is to offer patients the best quality of life, similar to that of patients with native bladders. To achieve that purpose, surgeons should be familiar with the characteristics of good candidates for neobladders, the possible intraoperative and postoperative problems related to the surgery, and the solutions to these problems. Postoperative surveillance and instructions given to the patients also contribute to successful, functional results. Here, we reviewed the indications, pitfalls, and solutions for orthotopic bladder substitutions and the patients' quality of life after surgery. When performed properly, orthotopic continent diversion offers good quality of life with few long-term complications. Therefore, we believe it is the best option for the majority of patients requiring cystectomy.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055345764

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21556208

DOI: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.4.233


Related references

Ileum bladder substitution after radical cystectomy. Scandinavian Journal of Urology & Nephrology Supplementum (135): 31-32, 1991

Radical cystectomy in women for orthotopic bladder substitution. Journal of Urology 163(4 Suppl ): 351, April, 2000

Radical cystectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution after radical retropubic prostatectomy: functional and oncological results. Urologia Internationalis 93(2): 237-240, 2015

Orthotopic bladder substitution for bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: A call to action. Canadian Urological Association Journal 12(6): 187-187, 2018

Oncological outcome after radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution in women. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 35(3): 320-325, 2008

Orthotopic bladder substitution after radical cystectomy in females Early functional results. Journal of Urology 157(4 SUPPL ): 98, 1997

Radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution: surgical tricks and management of complications. Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica 65(4): 225-234, 2014

Quality of life after radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution: A comparison between Italian and Swedish men. BJU International 85(1): 26-31, 2000

Orthotopic ileal bladder substitution following radical cystectomy using the linear-cutter stapling device. Surgical Technology International 20: 245-250, 2012

Orthotopic bladder substitution after radical cystectomy 5 Years of experience using a novel personal modification of the ileal S-pouch. European Urology 39(Suppl 5): 139, March, 2001

Distressful symptoms and well-being after radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution compared with a matched control population. Journal of Urology 168(1): 168-175, July, 2002

Gasless minimum incision access used for extracorporeal orthotopic bladder substitution after laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Central European Journal of Urology 67(3): 302-309, 2014

Local urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution in women: a prospective study. Journal of Urology 171(1): 275-278, 2003

The quality of life in men after radical cystectomy with a continent cutaneous diversion or orthotopic bladder substitution: is there a difference?. Journal of Urology 170(1): 331-331, 2003

Orthotopic bladder substitution after radical cystectomy: 5 Years of experience with a novel personal modification of the ileal S pouch. Journal of Urology 166(2): 532-537, August, 2001