+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Radical external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Japan: changing trends in the patterns of care process survey



Radical external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Japan: changing trends in the patterns of care process survey



International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 81(5): 1310-1318



To delineate changing trends in radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer in Japan. Data from 841 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with EBRT in the Japanese Patterns of Care Study (PCS) from 1996 to 2005 were analyzed. Significant increases in the proportions of patients with stage T1 to T2 disease and decrease in prostate-specific antigen values were observed. Also, there were significant increases in the percentages of patients treated with radiotherapy by their own choice. Median radiation doses were 65.0 Gy and 68.4 Gy from 1996 to 1998 and from 1999 to 2001, respectively, increasing to 70 Gy from 2003 to 2005. Moreover, conformal therapy was more frequently used from 2003 to 2005 (84.9%) than from 1996 to 1998 (49.1%) and from 1999 to 2001 (50.2%). On the other hand, the percentage of patients receiving hormone therapy from 2003 to 2005 (81.1%) was almost the same as that from 1996 to 1998 (86.3%) and from 1999 to 2001 (89.7%). Compared with the PCS in the United States, patient characteristics and patterns of treatments from 2003 to 2005 have become more similar to those in the United States than those from 1996 to 1998 and those from 1999 to 2001. This study indicates a trend toward increasing numbers of patients with early-stage disease and increasing proportions of patients treated with higher radiation doses with advanced equipment among Japanese prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT during 1996 to 2005 survey periods. Patterns of care for prostate cancer in Japan are becoming more similar to those in the United States.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055345843

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20950959

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.014


Related references

Radical external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Japan: changing trends in the patterns of care process survey between 1996-1998 and 1999-2001. Anticancer Research 25(5): 3507-3511, 2005

Radical external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Japan: preliminary results of the changing trends in the Patterns of Care process survey between 1996-1998 and 1999-2001. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 34(3): 131-136, 2004

Changing trends in the national practice for external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer The 1999 patterns of care survey for prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 54(2 Supplement): 8-9, 2002

Changing trends in national practice for external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: 1999 Patterns of Care survey for prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 59(4): 1053-1061, 2004

Radical external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Japan: differences in the patterns of care between Japan and the United States. Anticancer Research 26(1b): 575-580, 2006

Radical external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Japan: results of the 1999-2001 patterns of care process survey. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 36(1): 40-45, 2006

Radical external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Japan: preliminary results of the 1999-2001 patterns of care process survey. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 34(1): 29-36, 2004

External-beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Osaka, Japan, 1995-2006: time trends, outcome, and risk stratification. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 185(7): 446-452, 2009

Radical external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Japan: differences in the patterns of care among Japan, Germany, and the United States. Radiation Medicine 26(2): 57-62, 2008

External-beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer. Radiotherapy & Oncology 56(Supplement 1): S165-S166, September, 2000

Clinical progression rates after PSA relapse following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Journal of Urology 167(4 Supplement): 68, April, 2002

Retrospective comparison of external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy in high-risk, clinically localized prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 75(4): 975-982, 2009

Health-related quality of life 2 years after treatment with radical prostatectomy, prostate brachytherapy, or external beam radiotherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 72(2): 421-432, 2008

Metastasis after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparison of clinical cohorts adjusted for case mix. Journal of Clinical Oncology 28(9): 1508-1513, 2010

10-year single institution non-randomized comparison of biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Journal of Urology 171(4 Supplement): 313, April, 2004