+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Rapid parametric mapping of the longitudinal relaxation time T1 using two-dimensional variable flip angle magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla, 3 Tesla, and 7 Tesla



Rapid parametric mapping of the longitudinal relaxation time T1 using two-dimensional variable flip angle magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla, 3 Tesla, and 7 Tesla



Plos One 9(3): E91318



Visual but subjective reading of longitudinal relaxation time (T1) weighted magnetic resonance images is commonly used for the detection of brain pathologies. For this non-quantitative measure, diagnostic quality depends on hardware configuration, imaging parameters, radio frequency transmission field (B1+) uniformity, as well as observer experience. Parametric quantification of the tissue T1 relaxation parameter offsets the propensity for these effects, but is typically time consuming. For this reason, this study examines the feasibility of rapid 2D T1 quantification using a variable flip angles (VFA) approach at magnetic field strengths of 1.5 Tesla, 3 Tesla, and 7 Tesla. These efforts include validation in phantom experiments and application for brain T1 mapping. T1 quantification included simulations of the Bloch equations to correct for slice profile imperfections, and a correction for B1+. Fast gradient echo acquisitions were conducted using three adjusted flip angles for the proposed T1 quantification approach that was benchmarked against slice profile uncorrected 2D VFA and an inversion-recovery spin-echo based reference method. Brain T1 mapping was performed in six healthy subjects, one multiple sclerosis patient, and one stroke patient. Phantom experiments showed a mean T1 estimation error of (-63±1.5)% for slice profile uncorrected 2D VFA and (0.2±1.4)% for the proposed approach compared to the reference method. Scan time for single slice T1 mapping including B1+ mapping could be reduced to 5 seconds using an in-plane resolution of (2×2) mm2, which equals a scan time reduction of more than 99% compared to the reference method. Our results demonstrate that rapid 2D T1 quantification using a variable flip angle approach is feasible at 1.5T/3T/7T. It represents a valuable alternative for rapid T1 mapping due to the gain in speed versus conventional approaches. This progress may serve to enhance the capabilities of parametric MR based lesion detection and brain tissue characterization.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055366307

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24621588

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091318


Related references

7.0-Tesla Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of granulomatous meningoencephalitis in a Maltese dog: a comparison with 0.2 and 1.5-Tesla. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 71(11): 1545-1548, 2010

Optimal imaging parameters and the advantage of cerebrospinal fluid flow image using time-spatial labeling inversion pulse at 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of image quality for 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 70(12): 1439-1444, 2015

Optimal Imaging Parameters and the Advantage of Renal Artery Image Using Time-spatial Labeling Inversion Pulse at 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison of Image Quality for 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 72(11): 1113-1121, 2017

T2 relaxation time mapping of proximal tibiofibular cartilage by 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiologica 50(9): 1049-1056, 2009

Low flip angle gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine at 0.3 tesla. Acta Radiologica 30(4): 343-348, 1989

Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas at 3.0 tesla: qualitative and quantitative comparison with 1.5 tesla. Investigative Radiology 41(2): 175-180, 2006

Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement of brain tumors at 3 tesla versus 1.5 tesla. Investigative Radiology 37(3): 114-119, 2002

Optimizing 1.5-Tesla and 3-Tesla dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 18(2): 207-24, Viii, 2010

Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla detects more lesions in acute optic neuritis than at 1.5 tesla. Investigative Radiology 41(2): 76-82, 2006

The diagnostic performance of non-contrast 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3-T MRI) versus 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance arthrography (1.5-T MRA) in femoro-acetabular impingement. European Journal of Radiology 88: 109-116, 2017

Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the canine brain at 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla. American Journal of Veterinary Research 72(3): 350-356, 2011

Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 20(1): 47, 2018

Gated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of anatomy using 1.5 tesla and 0.6 tesla field strengths. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 27(6): 985-986, 1986

Functionality of veterinary identification microchips following low- (0.5 tesla) and high-field (3 tesla) magnetic resonance imaging. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 54(6): 618-622, 2014

Comparing 0.2 tesla with 1.5 tesla intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of setup, workflow, and efficiency. Academic Radiology 12(9): 1065-1079, 2005