+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Reducing the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for its application to an industrial wastewater treatment plant treating winery effluent wastewater



Reducing the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for its application to an industrial wastewater treatment plant treating winery effluent wastewater



Bioresource Technology 132: 244-253



The Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) is a complex model which is widely accepted as a common platform for anaerobic process modeling and simulation. However, it has a large number of parameters and states that hinder its calibration and use in control applications. A principal component analysis (PCA) technique was extended and applied to simplify the ADM1 using data of an industrial wastewater treatment plant processing winery effluent. The method shows that the main model features could be obtained with a minimum of two reactions. A reduced stoichiometric matrix was identified and the kinetic parameters were estimated on the basis of representative known biochemical kinetics (Monod and Haldane). The obtained reduced model takes into account the measured states in the anaerobic wastewater treatment (AWT) plant and reproduces the dynamics of the process fairly accurately. The reduced model can support on-line control, optimization and supervision strategies for AWT plants.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055430654

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23411455

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.166


Related references

A VFA-based controller for anaerobic digestion of industrial winery wastewater. Water Science and Technology 78(9): 1871-1878, 2018

Winery and distillery wastewater treatment by anaerobic digestion. Water Science and Technology 51(1): 137-144, 2005

Monitoring the performance and microbial diversity dynamics of a full scale anaerobic wastewater treatment plant treating sugar factory wastewater. Environmental Science. Processes and Impacts 15(2): 494-502, 2013

Anaerobic co-digestion of winery wastewater. Water Science and Technology 56(2): 49-54, 2007

Application of the Hybrid Constructed Wetland for a Reuse of the Effluent from Bio-industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant. Journal of Wetlands Researh 11(1): 115-121, 2009

Ultrafiltration fouling trend simulation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent with model wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment 56(13): 3438-3446, 2015

Anaerobic digestion: a new model for plant-wide wastewater treatment process modelling. Water Science and Technology 52(10-11): 1-11, 2005

Modeling of two-phase anaerobic process treating traditional Chinese medicine wastewater with the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1. Bioresource Technology 100(20): 4623-4631, 2009

Interactions between methanogenic and nitrate reducing bacteria during the anaerobic digestion of an industrial sulfate rich wastewater. FEMS microbiology ecology 29(4): 341-350, 1999

Anaerobic digestion treatment of olive mill wastewater for effluent re-use in irrigation. Desalination 137(1-3): 233-239, 2001

A dynamic model for predicting effluent concentrations of organic priority pollutants from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. Water Environment Research 67(6): 935-942, 1995

A dynamic model for predicting effluent concentrations of organic priority pollutants from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. Water Environment Research 68(3): 379-381, 1996

Anaerobic digestion and industrial wastewater treatment. Chemistry and Industry London ( 11): 404-406, 1994

Explicit temperature-based model for anaerobic digestion: application in domestic wastewater treatment in a UASB reactor. Bioresource Technology 133: 437-442, 2013

A Combined Activated Sludge Anaerobic Digestion Model (CASADM) to understand the role of anaerobic sludge recycling in wastewater treatment plant performance. Bioresource Technology 136: 196-204, 2013