EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Regional transfer programs for primary percutaneous coronary intervention


Critical Pathways in Cardiology 5(3): 147-152
Regional transfer programs for primary percutaneous coronary intervention

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 055445026

PMID: 18340229

DOI: 10.1097/01.hpc.0000234778.48054.1c



Related references

The relative safety and efficacy of abciximab and eptifibatide in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a large regional registry of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 51(5): 529-535, 2008

Transfer travel times for primary percutaneous coronary intervention from low-volume and non-percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals to high-volume centers in Florida. Annals of Emergency Medicine 58(3): 257-266, 2011

A transcriptional factor B paralog functions as an activator to DNA damage-responsive expression in archaea. Nucleic Acids Research, 2018

Early ST elevation myocardial infarction in non-capable percutaneous coronary intervention centres: in situ fibrinolysis vs. percutaneous coronary intervention transfer. European Heart Journal 37(13): 1034-1040, 2015

Right Ventricular Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the Glycometabolic Intervention as Adjunct to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction III Trial). American Journal of Cardiology 118(3): 338-344, 2016

Thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention improves myocardial reperfusion and reduces infarct size: the EXPIRA (thrombectomy with export catheter in infarct-related artery during primary percutaneous coronary intervention) prospective, randomized trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 53(4): 309-315, 2009

Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) trial. American Heart Journal 147(4): E16-E16, 2004

Antecedent thrombolytic therapy followed by planned rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction, compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. European Heart Journal 24(Abstract Supplement): 197, August-September, 2003

Comparison of impact of mortality risk on the survival benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention. American Journal of Cardiology 107(2): 220-224, 2011

Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed thrombolysis versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausaerzte. European Heart Journal 23(Abstract Supplement): 341, August-September, 2002