+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Relationship between age of hearing-loss onset, hearing-loss duration, and speech recognition in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss



Relationship between age of hearing-loss onset, hearing-loss duration, and speech recognition in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss



Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 12(4): 519-534



The factors responsible for interindividual differences in speech-understanding ability among hearing-impaired listeners are not well understood. Although audibility has been found to account for some of this variability, other factors may play a role. This study sought to examine whether part of the large interindividual variability of speech-recognition performance in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss could be accounted for by differences in hearing-loss onset type (early, progressive, or sudden), age at hearing-loss onset, or hearing-loss duration. Other potential factors including age, hearing thresholds, speech-presentation levels, and speech audibility were controlled. Percent-correct (PC) scores for syllables in dissyllabic words, which were either unprocessed or lowpass filtered at cutoff frequencies ranging from 250 to 2,000 Hz, were measured in 20 subjects (40 ears) with severe-to-profound hearing losses above 1 kHz. For comparison purposes, 20 normal-hearing subjects (20 ears) were also tested using the same filtering conditions and a range of speech levels (10-80 dB SPL). Significantly higher asymptotic PCs were observed in the early (<=4 years) hearing-loss onset group than in both the progressive- and sudden-onset groups, even though the three groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, hearing thresholds, or speech audibility. In addition, significant negative correlations between PC and hearing-loss onset age, and positive correlations between PC and hearing-loss duration were observed. These variables accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in speech-intelligibility scores than, and were not significantly correlated with, speech audibility, as quantified using a variant of the articulation index. Although the lack of statistical independence between hearing-loss onset type, hearing-loss onset age, hearing-loss duration, and age complicate and limit the interpretation of the results, these findings indicate that other variables than audibility can influence speech intelligibility in listeners with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055463711

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21350969

DOI: 10.1007/s10162-011-0261-8


Related references

Effects of Various Extents of High-Frequency Hearing Loss on Speech Recognition and Gap Detection at Low Frequencies in Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Neural Plasticity 2017: 8941537, 2018

A cross-sectional study of speech- and language-abilities of children with normal hearing, mild fluctuating conductive hearing loss, or moderate to profound sensoneurinal hearing loss. International Journal Of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 44(3): 251-258,. 10, 1998

Effects of FM system fitted into normal hearing ear on speech-in-noise recognition in Japanese school-aged children with unilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss. Journal of Medical Investigation 65(3.4): 216-220, 2018

Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Otology and Neurotology 34(6): 1064-1070, 2014

Preferred low- and high-frequency compression ratios among hearing aid users with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18(1): 17-33, 2007

The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(3): 1752-1763, 2006

Bimodal Hearing in Individuals with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: Benefits, Challenges, and Management. Seminars in Hearing 39(4): 405-413, 2018

An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 24(2): 138-150, 2013

Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26(3): 260-274, 2015

Analysis of hearing improvement in patients with severe to profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss according to the level of pure tone hearing threshold. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 269(9): 2057-2060, 2013

The impact of cochlear implantation on speech understanding, subjective hearing performance, and tinnitus perception in patients with unilateral severe to profound hearing loss. Otology and Neurotology 36(3): 430-436, 2015

Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology 47(8): 461-475, 2008

Profound high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss treatment with a totally implantable hearing system. Otology and Neurotology 32(9): 1428-1431, 2012

The relation between hearing loss for pure tones and hearing loss for speech among hearing-impaired children. British Journal of Audiology 14(4): 115-121, 1980

Speech recognition in noise under hearing protection: A computational study of the combined effects of hearing loss and hearing protector attenuation. International Journal of Audiology 55 Suppl 1(): S30-S40, 2016