+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Renal vein extension during living-donor kidney transplantation in the era of hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy



Renal vein extension during living-donor kidney transplantation in the era of hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy



Transplantation 99(4): 786-790



To evaluate retrospectively the clinical outcomes of living-donor kidney transplantations (LDKTs) using renal vein extension (RVE) for donor kidneys with short renal veins. Between January 2007 and December 2010, a total of 576 LDKTs were performed with grafts generated by hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: 31 (5.4%) transplants with RVE and 545 (94.6%) without an additional vascular procedure for renal vein lengthening. Outcomes were compared in patients who did and did not undergo the RVE procedure during transplantation. The 31 transplantation patients that underwent RVE involved procured kidneys with short renal veins: 29 were right-sided kidneys (93.5%) and 2 were left-sided kidneys (6.5%) (P=0.00). The RVE grafts were obtained from allogenic gonadal veins from female donors (n=16, 51.6%) and iliac veins from deceased donors (n=15, 48.4%). There were no postoperative complications related to the RVE procedure. During a follow-up period of 45.6±15.9 months, there were one (3.2%) graft failure among the 31 patients with RVE and four (0.7%) among the 545 patients without RVE. Delayed graft function was noted in one (3.2%) of the RVE patients and 22 (4.0%) of the patients without RVE. There was no statistically significant difference in graft failure (P=0.24) or delayed graft function (P=1.00) between the two groups. During LDKT, donor kidneys with exceptionally short renal veins, which may result in unavoidable tension during renal vein anastomosis, may be modified by RVE, thus facilitating a secure anastomosis and reducing postoperative complications.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055490980

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25286054

DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000443


Related references

Early and late graft function after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: comparison with open donor nephrectomy. Urologia Internationalis 84(1): 61-66, 2010

Mini-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in living-donor kidney transplantation: A retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Surgery 53: 339-344, 2018

Safety and Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Early Complication, Donor and Recipient Outcome with Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology 2018, 2018

Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy compared to the hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. World Journal of Urology 20(6): 356-359, 2003

Comparison of renal function recovery in donor and recipient after living donor nephrectomy: Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. open procedures. European Urology Suppl.s 7(3): 195, 2008

Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. American Journal of Transplantation 2(10): 983-988, 2002

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from living donor using hand-assisted laparoscopic donor surgery: single-center experience. Transplantation Proceedings 47(4): 1096-1098, 2016

Expanding the Living Donor Pool "Second Act": Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy and ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Improve Donor Recruitment. Transplantation Proceedings 47(7): 2126-2129, 2016

A randomized clinical trial of living donor nephrectomy: a plea for a differentiated appraisal of mini-open muscle splitting incision and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transplant International 25(9): 976-986, 2013

Donor complications following laparoscopic compared to hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: an analysis of the literature. Journal of Transplantation 2010: 825689, 2010

Retroaortic renal vein not a contraindication for hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transplantation Proceedings 35(2): 784, 2003

Renal artery clip dislodgement during hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 17(11): 1851, 2004

Impact of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy on donor's quality of life, emotional, and social state. Transplantation Proceedings 42(5): 1487-1491, 2010

Transperitoneal deviceless hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: an alternative technique for kidney recovery. Journal of Endourology 24(10): 1617-1623, 2011

Comparison of renal artery occlusion techniques in hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Journal of Endourology 23(6): 933-937, 2009