+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Repair integrity and functional outcomes after arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair



Repair integrity and functional outcomes after arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair



Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 94(8): E48



We evaluated the clinical and imaging outcomes of arthroscopic suture-bridge repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. From May 2007 to April 2008, seventy-nine patients with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear consecutively underwent arthroscopic suture-bridge repair. The mean age of the patients was 58.3 years (range, thirty-eight to seventy-eight years), and the mean duration of follow-up was 30.6 months (range, twenty-four to forty-four months). Seventy-three patients underwent postoperative ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging; seventy-one underwent the imaging at a minimum of two years postoperatively, and the remaining two did so after the operation because of persistent symptoms. The clinical results of seventy-seven patients (all except two who had undergone revision) were evaluated at a minimum of two years postoperatively. University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant-Murley scores were used for clinical and functional evaluations before surgery and at the time of final follow-up. The imaging follow-up rate was 92%, and the follow-up rate for clinical evaluation was 100%. The re-tear rate after suture-bridge repair was 15%. The re-tear rate of the medium, large, and massive tears (as classified according to the anterior-to-posterior diameter of the tear) was 12%, 21%, and 22%, respectively. Massive and large tears tended to show a higher re-tear rate than did medium tears, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.417 and p = 0.964, respectively). The mean UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores improved from 21.6, 50.4, and 52.7 preoperatively to 30.9, 86.2, and 74.7 at the time of final follow-up (p < 0.001). However, the clinical outcomes after the operation did not differ significantly between the patients who had healing of the tear and those who did not (p = 0.438, p = 0.625, and p = 0.898 for the UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores, respectively). Arthroscopic suture-bridge repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears was followed by a re-tear rate of 15% as seen with imaging and resulted in significant improvement of functional outcomes and clinical results compared with the preoperative findings.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055492541

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22517394

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.k.00158


Related references

Comparison of repair integrity and functional outcomes for 3 arthroscopic suture bridge rotator cuff repair techniques. American Journal of Sports Medicine 41(2): 271-277, 2013

Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique. American Journal of Sports Medicine 40(2): 294-299, 2012

Repair Integrity and Functional Outcome After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Double-Row Versus Suture-Bridge Technique. Yearbook of Hand and Upper Limb Surgery 2012: 204-206, 2012

Clinical outcomes and repair integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture-bridge technique with or without medial tying: prospective comparative study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 13(1): 212, 2018

Clinical and radiographic outcomes after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears using a suture bridge technique: assessment of repair integrity on magnetic resonance imaging. American Journal of Sports Medicine 40(4): 786-793, 2012

Clinical outcomes and repair integrity after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: suture-bridge versus double-row modified Mason-Allen technique. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 27(11): 1953-1959, 2018

Arthroscopic suture bridge rotator cuff repair: functional outcome, repair integrity, and preoperative factors related to postoperative outcome. Physician and Sportsmedicine 44(2): 126-132, 2016

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?. American Journal of Sports Medicine 39(10): 2108-2116, 2011

Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. American Journal of Sports Medicine 36(8): 1496-1503, 2008

Clinical outcomes and structural integrity of arthroscopic double-row versus suture-bridge repair for rotator cuff tears. Journal of Orthopaedics 15(2): 396-400, 2018

Functional outcomes and structural integrity after double-pulley suture bridge rotator cuff repair using serial ultrasonographic examination. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 21(12): 1753-1763, 2012

Ultrasonic evaluation of the repair integrity can predict functional outcomes after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 23(2): 376-385, 2015

Repair integrity and functional outcomes of arthroscopic repair for intratendinous partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 27(2): 2309499019847227, 2019

Repair Integrity and Functional Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Subscapularis Tendon Repair. Arthroscopy 34(9): 2541-2548, 2018

Evaluation of the functional results after rotator cuff arthroscopic repair with the suture bridge technique. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia 52(2): 164-168, 2017