+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Respecting patient autonomy: understanding the impact on NHS hospital in-patients of legislation and guidance relating to patient capacity and consent



Respecting patient autonomy: understanding the impact on NHS hospital in-patients of legislation and guidance relating to patient capacity and consent



Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 16(1): 13-20



to determine the extent and nature of the decisions individuals are asked to make as in-patients, and whether doctors, nurses, other health care practitioners, and housekeepers engaged in routine (non-emergency) medical assessments, investigations and treatments, or acts of personal care observe the Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment, the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales) 2005, and the guidance from the Dignity in Care Campaign. hospital staff working on a general medical ward and a ward for older people in a large teaching hospital in England were observed for over 50 hours carrying out acts of medical and personal care. The observations were recorded using a semi-structured record sheet, complemented by unstructured field notes. Observations were subsequently categorized, coded and counted. a total of 206 acts were observed, 127 (62%) of which were acts of medical care and 79 (38%) were acts of personal care. Patients approached for acts of personal care were generally presented with choices and options (78%). In contrast, when approached for acts of medical care, they were rarely presented with a choice (6%); instead, health care practitioners either requested permission to perform a procedure (29%) or informed patients that they were about to perform a procedure (50%). Irrespective of the way in which health care practitioners approached patients about acts of medical care, in the overwhelming majority of instances, patients complied (80%, 99 cases), either by giving permission for the act to be performed, or by complying and/or cooperating with the health care practitioner. In only a minority of cases did patients either refuse or resist a proposed procedure (9%). patients were asked to make many varied decisions and the approaches taken by hospital staff differed depending on the nature of the decision and/or act in question. In contrast to personal care decisions, when health care practitioners approached patients in order to undertake routine acts of medical care, they generally did so in a manner that did not acknowledge that the patient had a right to exercise a choice. This is contrary to current law, policy and guidance. It seems to be rooted in the practical demands of running a hospital ward and uncertainties as to the purpose of securing patient consent before undertaking routine acts of medical care.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055525155

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20729250

DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2010.009148


Related references

Proxy Consent by a Physician When a Patient's Capacity Is Equivocal: Respecting a Patient's Autonomy by Overriding the Patient's Ostensible Treatment Preferences. Journal of Clinical Ethics 29(4): 266-275, 2019

Respecting patient autonomy: screening at CT and informed consent. Radiology 226(3): 633-634, 2003

Respecting patient autonomy and obtaining their informed consent: ethical theorymissing in action. PhysioTherapy 91(4): 197-203, 2005

Respecting autonomy by respecting persons: taking the patient's story seriously. Humane Medicine 6(2): 107-112, 1990

Respecting patient autonomy versus protecting the patient's health: a dilemma for healthcare providers. Jona's Healthcare Law Ethics and Regulation 11(4): 120-4; Quiz 125-6, 2010

When respecting patient autonomy may not be in the patient's best interest. Jona's Healthcare Law Ethics and Regulation 9(2): 46-49, 2007

Donation after cardiac death: respecting patient autonomy and guaranteeing donation with guidance from Oregon's Death with Dignity Act. Albany Law Review 75(4): 2199-2222, 2012

Informed consent to psychotherapy: protecting the dignity and respecting the autonomy of patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology 64(5): 576-588, 2008

South Carolina patient safety legislation: the impact of the Lewis Blackman Hospital Patient Safety Act on a large teaching hospital. Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association 105(1): 12-15, 2009

Respecting the patient's autonomy. Soins; la Revue de Reference Infirmiere 63(824): 25-27, 2018

Respecting Patient's Autonomy - A Challenge. Psychiatrische Praxis 44(3): 122-124, 2018

Informed consent in the surgical patient. Reflections on the basic law of patient autonomy. Cirugia Espanola 77(6): 321-326, 2005

Health-care professionals' knowledge, attitudes and behaviours relating to patient capacity to consent to treatment: an integrative review. Nursing Ethics 20(6): 684-707, 2013

Respecting patient consent. Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien 41: 1850 1852, 1995

The challenge of autonomy. Respecting the patient's wishes. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 10(3): 160-168, 1991