+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of physical and biological properties of CardioCel® with commonly used bioscaffolds

Comparison of physical and biological properties of CardioCel® with commonly used bioscaffolds

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 26(6): 985-992

Durability of bioscaffolds cross-linked with glutaraldehyde and used in cardiovascular surgery is limited by biomechanical instability, calcification and reduced biocompatibility. This study compares CardioCel®, a bovine pericardial scaffold engineered via the ADAPT® process to ensure optimized biostability and biocompatibility, with the commonly used bioscaffolds. Bovine pericardial scaffolds, cross-linked with 0.6% glutaraldehyde (XenoLogiX™, PeriGuard®), dye-mediated photo-oxidized (PhotoFix™) and a non-crosslinked porcine scaffold (CorMatrix®), were compared with CardioCel (decellularized, cross-linked with 0.05% monomeric glutaraldehyde, detoxified) by thermal stability and mechanical tests. Biocompatibility and calcification were assessed in a juvenile subcutaneous rat model at 6 and 12 weeks. CardioCel displayed significantly higher (P < 0.01) cross-link stability (77.99 ± 0.64 °C) than CorMatrix (57.88 ± 0.22 °C) and PhotoFix (53.96 ± 0.41 °C). Tensile strength of CardioCel (8.31 ± 3.36 MPa) was comparable with XenoLogiX (11.00 ± 5.43 MPa, P = 0.734), PeriGuard (16.44 ± 6.69 MPa, P = 0.136), PhotoFix (7.10 ± 6.11, P = 0.399) and CorMatrix (9.75 ± 2.61, P = 0.204). XenoLogiX and PeriGuard recorded the highest Young's modulus (67.01 ± 30.36 vs 95.67 ± 45.91 MPa), while CardioCel (50.21 ± 19.92 MPa) was comparable with CorMatrix (36.78 ± 10.47 MPa, P = 0.204) and PhotoFix (33.50 ± 10.24, P = 0.399). CorMatrix displayed a significantly (P < 0.05) greater stiffness (4.74 ± 0.77 MPa) at 10% strain than PeriGuard (3.73 ± 1.79 MPa), PhotoFix (1.59 ± 0.40 MPa) and CardioCel (3.39 ± 0.83 MPa). Differences in extractable calcium did not reach significance; however, the inorganic phosphorus content of PhotoFix (21.3 ± 9.0 µg/mg) was higher than CardioCel (11.35 ± 0.76 µg/mg, P = 0.004) or PeriGuard (10.7 ± 2.18 µg/mg, P = 0.002) at 12 weeks. CardioCel underwent a typical mild host-graft response with fibroblast infiltration and remodelling. Foreign body reactions were visible in both XenoLogiX and PeriGuard, with isolated fibroblast infiltration. PhotoFix showed severe inflammation and 2 implants were completely degraded at 12 weeks. CardioCel demonstrated optimized physical properties, minimal mineralization potential and superior biocompatibility. These results may benefit the long-term performance of this bioscaffold for cardiovascular surgery. The favourable characteristics of the comparator products were counterbalanced by less desirable features that may have negative implications on durability and performance when used in cardiovascular procedures.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055532592

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29361133

DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivx413

Related references

Comparison of morphology and mechanical properties of PLGA bioscaffolds. Biomedical Materials 3(2): 025006, 2008

Physical Properties of Implanted Porous Bioscaffolds Regulate Skin Repair: Focusing on Mechanical and Structural Features. Advanced Healthcare Materials 7(6): E1700894, 2018

Comparison of physical, chemical and biological properties of saponins. Gunma Jour Med Sci 11(1): 1-6, 1962

Physical and biological comparison of the radiation properties of Fe55 and Fe59. Dissertation Absts 17(9): 1872-1873, 1957

A Comparison Of Visna And Maedi Viruses. I. Physical, Chemical And Biological Properties. Research in Veterinary Science 6: 117-129, 1965

Comparison of biological and physical properties of human and animal A(H1N1) influenza viruses. Research in Virology 140(5): 395-404, 1989

Pyrularia thionin Physical properties, biological responses and comparison to other thionins and cardiotoxin. Journal of Toxicology Toxin Reviews 11(3): 169-191, 1992

Comparison of the bio-physical and biological properties of staphylococcal protein-A extracted by salt-washing and conventional procedure. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie, und Hygiene. Series A, Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Virology, Parasitology 258(2-3): 213-222, 1984

Physical properties of some commonly used potting media and their components. New Zealand, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Development and use of soil less media for horticulture: 3-1 to 3-15, 1979

Biological, physical, and chemical properties of Eastern equine encephalitis virus. I. Purification and physical properties. Journal of Virology 7(2): 233-240, 1971

A comparison of the physical, chemical, and biological properties of sludges from a complete-mix activated sludge reactor and a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Environment Research 79(3): 320-328, 2007

A comparative study of the physical properties of five commonly used root canal sealers. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 24(1): 89-101, 1967

Physical properties and compact analysis of commonly used direct compression binders. Aaps Pharmscitech 4(4): E62, 2004

A comparison of physical activity levels in commonly encountered paediatric disability populations. PhysioTherapy 102: E259-E260, 2016

Physical properties of some synthetic trialkyl/aryl phosphates commonly found in environmental samples. Environmental Science & Technology 17(5): 256-261, 1983