+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of sagittal values between lateral decubitus plain radiography and supine computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures: a greater degree of kyphosis is observed in plain radiography than CT

Comparison of sagittal values between lateral decubitus plain radiography and supine computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures: a greater degree of kyphosis is observed in plain radiography than CT

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 138(6): 745-755

Radiologic parameters are important factors for planning the treatment for thoracolumbar fracture. However, we noted that measurements of the degree of kyphosis by lateral decubitus plain radiography were greater than supine CT. The cause of this discrepancy is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed the plain radiographs and CT scans of 90 patients with thoracolumbar fractures (fracture group). We measured the segmental sagittal angle (SSA) on lateral decubitus plain radiographs and in the median sagittal plane on CT scans obtained in the supine position. The method agreement (plain radiography versus CT) was determined by utilizing Bland-Altman plots. For the purpose of comparison, the same analyses were performed in a group of age and sex-matched controls (normal group). After establishing the method disagreement in the fracture group, the factors that contributed to the difference in the SSA between plain radiography and CT, as well as their threshold values, were determined. On Bland-Altman plots for the fracture group, the mean difference was 4.53° [95% confidence interval (CI) - 4.87° to 13.93°]. For the normal group, the mean difference was - 0.64° (95% CI - 5.87° to 4.58°). On univariate analysis, male sex, thoracolumbar level, and SSA(X) were significant factors associated with ∆SSA (P = 0.03, 0.002, and 0.000, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis showed that SSA(X) was the only significant factor. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the optimal threshold of SSA(X) was 17° with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 75% (area under curve: 0.752). The mean SSA determined on lateral decubitus plain radiographs indicated significantly more kyphosis than that determined on CT images obtained in supine position. When the SSA on plain radiography is more than 17°, there might be a significant discrepancy between the two imaging modalities. This discrepancy seems to be mainly attributable to the difference in patient positioning (lateral decubitus position for plain radiography versus supine position for CT imaging).

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055532918

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29372386

DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-2889-x

Related references

Plain radiography versus computed tomography scans in the diagnosis and management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 33(16): E548-E552, 2008

Comparison of sagittal computed tomography and plain film radiography in a scaphoid fracture model. Journal of Hand Surgery 30(3): 534-542, 2005

Predictive Factors for and Detection of Lateral Hinge Fractures Following Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Plain Radiography Versus Computed Tomography. Arthroscopy 34(11): 3073-3079, 2018

Indications for computed tomography (CT-) diagnostics in proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study of plain radiography and computed tomography. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders 10: 33, 2009

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography detects greater metabolic changes that are not represented by plain radiography for patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 72(10): 1957-1965, 2014

A Comparison of Plain Radiography with Computer Tomography in Determining Coronal and Sagittal Alignments following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 11(2): 45-52, 2017

Accurate Measurement of Greater Tuberosity Displacement Without Computed Tomography: Validation of a Method on Plain Radiography to Guide Surgical Treatment. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 28(8): 445-451, 2016

Supine thoracolumbar sagittal spine alignment: comparing computerized tomography and plain radiographs. Spine 37(4): 340-345, 2012

Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 167(1): 141-144, 1996

Comparison of computed tomography and plain radiography in assessing traumatic spinal deformity. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques 22(3): 197-201, 2009

Comparison of plain radiography, conventional tomography, and computed tomography in detecting intrathoracic lymph node metastases from lung carcinoma. Radiology 142(1): 157-161, 1982

Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 39(2): 72-78, 2010

Digital tomosynthesis for bone erosion scoring in gout: comparison with plain radiography and computed tomography. Rheumatology 53(9): 1712-1713, 2014

Evaluation of skull base erosion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of plain radiography and computed tomography. Oncology 51(1): 42-46, 1994

Comparison of pharyngeal airway changes on plain radiography and cone-beam computed tomography after orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 69(11): E385-E394, 2011