+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Revolution or reform in human subjects research oversight



Revolution or reform in human subjects research oversight



Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 40(4): 922-929



The contemporary system of prospective oversight of human subjects research has been criticized as inefficient and ineffective. Plausible approaches to research oversight range from no prospective review, to review-and-comment, to the current review-and-approve regime. Articulating this spectrum offers an opportunity to consider systematically the strengths and disadvantages of each.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055566680

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23289695

DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00721.x


Related references

'Human subjects research' as stigmatized activity: Implications for oversight reform. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 71: 417-419, 2015

Improving protection for human research subjects: better oversight, not just more oversight. American Journal of Bioethics 8(11): 13-15, 2008

Designing Oversight for Nanomedicine Research in Human Subjects: Systematic Analysis of Exceptional Oversight for Emerging Technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13(4): 1449-1465, 2011

Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress II: principles and recommendations for oversight of an institution's financial interests in human subjects research. Academic Medicine 78(2): 237-245, 2003

Protecting subjects, preserving trust, promoting progress I: policy and guidelines for the oversight of individual financial interests in human subjects research. Academic Medicine 78(2): 225-236, 2003

Oversight of human participants research: identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals. Annals of Internal Medicine 141(4): 282-291, 2004

The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects. Journal of Medical Ethics 26(5): 334-339, 2000

The Case for a New System for Oversight of Research on Human Subjects. Journal of Medical Ethics 26(5): 334-339, 2000

New oversight agency proposed for human research subjects. Human Research Report 15(3): 9, 2000

Federal oversight and regulation of human subjects research -- an update. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10(3): 261-264, 2000

National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research. Accountability in Research 7(2-4): 303-309, 1999

NBAC report calls for increased federal oversight of research on human subjects. Journal of Investigative Medicine 49(4): 307-308, 2001

Recommendations for nanomedicine human subjects research oversight: an evolutionary approach for an emerging field. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics 40(4): 716-750, 2012

Moving beyond compliance: measuring ethical quality to enhance the oversight of human subjects research. Irb 29(5): 9, 2007

Post-approval monitoring and oversight of U.S.-initiated human subjects research in resource-constrained countries. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11(2): 119-123, 2014