+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation

Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation

Journal of Stroke 15(3): 174-181

Research into rehabilitation robotics has grown rapidly and the number of therapeutic rehabilitation robots has expanded dramatically during the last two decades. Robotic rehabilitation therapy can deliver high-dosage and high-intensity training, making it useful for patients with motor disorders caused by stroke or spinal cord disease. Robotic devices used for motor rehabilitation include end-effector and exoskeleton types; herein, we review the clinical use of both types. One application of robot-assisted therapy is improvement of gait function in patients with stroke. Both end-effector and the exoskeleton devices have proven to be effective complements to conventional physiotherapy in patients with subacute stroke, but there is no clear evidence that robotic gait training is superior to conventional physiotherapy in patients with chronic stroke or when delivered alone. In another application, upper limb motor function training in patients recovering from stroke, robot-assisted therapy was comparable or superior to conventional therapy in patients with subacute stroke. With end-effector devices, the intensity of therapy was the most important determinant of upper limb motor recovery. However, there is insufficient evidence for the use of exoskeleton devices for upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. For rehabilitation of hand motor function, either end-effector and exoskeleton devices showed similar or additive effects relative to conventional therapy in patients with chronic stroke. The present evidence supports the use of robot-assisted therapy for improving motor function in stroke patients as an additional therapeutic intervention in combination with the conventional rehabilitation therapies. Nevertheless, there will be substantial opportunities for technical development in near future.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055591705

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24396811

DOI: 10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174

Related references

Technology-assisted stroke rehabilitation in Mexico: a pilot randomized trial comparing traditional therapy to circuit training in a Robot/technology-assisted therapy gym. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 13(1): 83, 2016

Sequential combination of robot-assisted therapy and constraint-induced therapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Neurology 261(5): 1037-1045, 2014

Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 27(3): 677-679, 2015

Translation of robot-assisted rehabilitation to clinical service: a comparison of the rehabilitation effectiveness of EMG-driven robot hand assisted upper limb training in practical clinical service and in clinical trial with laboratory configuration for chronic stroke. Biomedical Engineering Online 17(1): 91, 2018

Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 48(1): 111-121, 2012

Robot-assisted therapy for balance function rehabilitation after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies 95: 7, 2019

Current Trends in Robot-Assisted Upper-Limb Stroke Rehabilitation: Promoting Patient Engagement in Therapy. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports 2(3): 184-195, 2014

Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 49(4): 479-496, 2012

Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83(7): 952-959, 2002

Robot-assisted therapy using the MOTOmed letto 2 for the integrated early rehabilitation of stroke patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Human Physiology 42(8): 885-890, 2016

Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 48(4): 445-458, 2011

Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 48(4): 355-366, 2011

Can robot-based measurements improve prediction of motor performance after robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in patients with moderate-to-severe sub-acute stroke?. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 37(2): 119-129, 2019

ROBOT - Assisted Rehabilitation in Patients After Stroke. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 202: 316, 2014

Robot assisted upper limb therapy combined with upper limb rehabilitation was at least as effective on a range of outcomes, and cost less to deliver, as an equal dose of upper limb rehabilitation alone for people with stroke. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 62(1): 74-76, 2015