+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Role of tissue digestion and extensive sperm search after microdissection testicular sperm extraction



Role of tissue digestion and extensive sperm search after microdissection testicular sperm extraction



Fertility and Sterility 96(2): 299-302



To report the chance of sperm discovery in the laboratory when sperm were not identified in the operating room (OR). Clinical retrospective study. Department of urology at a tertiary university hospital. A total of 1,054 men with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Preoperative and intraoperative parameters were analyzed relative to the chance of sperm identification using a tissue digestion protocol in the laboratory if no sperm were observed in the OR. Sperm retrieval, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. Sperm were found in the OR in 52.5% of the 1,054 men. Of the 501 men for whom sperm were not identified by andrologists in the OR, sperm were found in the laboratory for an additional 35 (7%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of germ cells intraoperatively was the only predictor of identifying sperm in the laboratory after tissue digestion. In men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction, when sperm were not observed in the OR despite extensive mechanical processing, sperm were observed in the laboratory for 7% of the men. This information is valuable in counseling couples in the immediate postoperative period when no sperm were identified intraoperatively.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055614885

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21669413

DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.033


Related references

Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility 104(5): 1099-103.E1-3, 2016

Testicular sperm extraction: Microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Human Reproduction 14(1): 131-135, 1999

Sperm fine-needle aspiration (FNA) mapping after failed microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE): location and patterns of found sperm. Asian Journal of Andrology 2018, 2018

Sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in nonobstructive azoospermic patients with Klinefelter syndrome. Andrologia 2018, 2018

Salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failed conventional testicular sperm extraction in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Journal of Urology 175(4): 1446-9; Discussion 1449, 2006

Age does not adversely affect sperm retrieval in men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertility and Sterility 101(3): 653-655, 2014

Localization of sperm during microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Journal of Urology 189(2): 643-646, 2013

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: effect of prior biopsy on success of sperm retrieval. Journal of Urology 177(4): 1447-1449, 2007

Duration of microdissection testicular sperm extraction procedures: relationship to sperm retrieval success. Journal of Urology 185(4): 1394-1397, 2011

Serum testosterone levels and other determinants of sperm retrieval in microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Translational Andrology and Urology 6(2): 282-287, 2017

Sperm retrieval outcomes with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with cryptozoospermia. Andrology 3(3): 462-466, 2016

Predictive factors of successful sperm retrieval on microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Japanese men. Reproductive Medicine and Biology 15(1): 29-33, 2015

A comparison of models for predicting sperm retrieval before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Journal of Urology 189(2): 638-642, 2013

Azoospermia Type Does Not Affect Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Results When Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Is Performed. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 61(11-12): 581-584, 2018

Confocal fluorescence microscopy in a murine model of microdissection testicular sperm extraction to improve sperm retrieval. Journal of Urology 187(5): 1918-1923, 2013