EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Safety and feasibility of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis in deep vein thrombosis



Safety and feasibility of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis in deep vein thrombosis



European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 41(4): 526-532



One in four patients with primary iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) develops post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) within 1 year despite optimal standard anticoagulant therapy. Removal of thrombus by thrombolytic drugs may prevent PTS. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term safety and efficacy of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis (US-accelerated CDT). This was a prospective non-randomised interventional study with US-accelerated CDT for DVT. Twelve patients with DVT (seven caval-iliofemoropopliteal, three iliofemoropopliteal, one femoropopliteal and one superior caval vein thrombosis) receiving standard anticoagulant and compression therapy, were treated with additional US-accelerated CDT (13 procedures) using the EKOS Endowave(®) system (EKOS Corporation, Bothell, WA, USA) between October 2008 and January 2010. Thrombolysis was successful in 85% (11/13), with complete clot lysis (>90% restored patency) and in one case with partial clot lysis (50-90% restored patency). No pulmonary embolism and one bleeding at the catheter-insertion site were observed. In three patients, underlying lesions were successfully treated with balloon angioplasty and stent insertion. Four patients developed early recurrent thrombosis due to untreated residual venous obstruction. US-accelerated CDT is a safe and promising treatment in patients with DVT. Residual venous obstruction should be treated by angioplasty and stent insertion to avoid early re-thrombosis.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055642857

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21256773

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.11.035



Related references

Treatment of chronic deep vein thrombosis using ultrasound accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 46(3): 366-371, 2013

A systematic review of ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis: -, 2018

Treatment of deep vein thrombosis in a patient with Behçet syndrome using ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 21(12): 2193-2194, 2018

Patency rate and quality of life after ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis. Phlebology 33(4): 251-260, 2017

Ultrasound-accelerated vs standard catheter-directed thrombolysis--a comparative study in patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 23(11): 1460-1466, 2013

A Retrospective Comparison of Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Alone for Treatment of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 39(8): 1115-1121, 2016

Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis in acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Journal of Vascular Surgery. Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 1(3): 225-230, 2013

Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for the management of postpartum deep venous thrombosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 39(5): 1065-1069, 2013

Endovascular treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis using ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 48(7-8): 460-465, 2015

The feasibility of catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis: a regional perspective. Phlebology 26(3): 94-101, 2011

Trellis pharmacomechanical thrombectomy followed by catheter-directed thrombolysis versus catheter-directed thrombolysis alone in treatment of acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis a 5 year single center experience. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 25(3): S17-S18, 2014

Ultrasound-assisted versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 8(1): -, 2015

Single-center retrospective review of ultrasound-accelerated versus traditional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Vascular 25(5): 525-532, 2017

Comparison of vein valve function following pharmacomechanical thrombolysis versus simple catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. Journal of Vascular Surgery 56(5): 1351-1354, 2013

Safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 96(35): E7922-E7922, 2017