+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Complications of harvesting a connective tissue graft from the palate. A retrospective study and description of a new technique



Complications of harvesting a connective tissue graft from the palate. A retrospective study and description of a new technique



Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 9(12): E1439-E1445



Connective tissue graft (CTG) is considered as the gold standard for the treatment of gingival recessions (GR). There are few studies assessing the complications that can arise in the donor site when harvesting a connective tissue graft (CTG) and how the harvesting technique can influence those complications. A retrospective clinical study was carried out in order to compare the complications observed in 40 patients with Miller class I, II and III GR ≥ 3 mm, after using the trap-door technique (TD) in the control group and a newly described technique, the "UPV/EHU technique", in the test group. Patients were consecutively allocated to each treatment group. Patients were monitored 14 days after surgery in order to evaluate post-operative complications in the donor site: presence of pain (P), bleeding (B), infection (I) and necrosis > 30%. Although morbidity was observed in both groups, it was less important in the test group (no pain and minimal pain in 30% and 35% of the cases, respectively, and absence of bleeding or infection and necrosis >30% in only 5% of the cases). Within the limits of this study, this newly described "UPV/EHU technique" should be considered as a treatment option when harvesting a CTG, with minimal morbidity for patients. Key words:Connective tissue graft, pain, gingival recessions, wound healing, cosmetic periodontal plastic surgery, trap-door technique, "UPV/EHU technique".

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055670777

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29410760

DOI: 10.4317/jced.54337


Related references

An alternative technique to the harvesting of a connective tissue graft from a thin palate: enhanced wound healing. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 27(2): 133-139, 2007

Relative Composition of Fibrous Connective and Fatty/Glandular Tissue in Connective Tissue Grafts Depends on the Harvesting Technique but not the Donor Site of the Hard Palate. Journal of Periodontology 86(12): 1331-1339, 2017

A Novel Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting Technique: The Ring Method. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 2018, 2018

PRF improves wound healing and postoperative discomfort after harvesting subepithelial connective tissue graft from palate: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Oral Investigations 2019, 2019

Palatal harvesting technique modification for better control of the connective tissue graft dimensions. Brazilian Dental Journal 24(6): 565-568, 2015

Effect of GaAIAs low-level laser therapy on the healing of human palate mucosa after connective tissue graft harvesting: randomized clinical trial. Lasers in Medical Science 30(6): 1695-1702, 2016

Coronally Advanced Flap Technique to Treat Class I and II Gingival Recession in Combination with Connective Tissue Graft or Equine Collagen Matrix: A Retrospective Study. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 37(4): E217-E223, 2018

A New Technique for Increasing Keratinized Tissue Around Dental Implants: The Partially Epithelialized Free Connective Tissue Graft. Retrospective Analysis of a Case Series. Journal of Oral Implantology 41(4): 467-472, 2013

Treatment of multiple areas of gingival recession using a simple harvesting technique for autogenous connective tissue graft. Journal of Periodontology 80(10): 1680-1687, 2010

Does harvesting connective tissue grafts from the palate cause persistent sensory dysfunction? A pilot study. Quintessence International 40(6): 479-489, 2009

Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 28(5): 497-507, 2008

Use of a combination epithelized-subepithelial connective tissue graft for closure and soft tissue augmentation of an extraction site following ridge preservation or implant placement: description of a technique. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 30(4): 375-381, 2010

Controlled Palatal Harvest Technique for Harvesting a Palatal Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 39(2): E9-E12, 2018

The comparison of modified semilunar technique in conjunction with connective tissue and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage: a randomized controlled trial. Electronic Physician 9(2): 3699-3705, 2017

A comparative evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) versus platelet concentrate graft (PCG) in the treatment of gingival recession using coronally advanced flap technique: A 12-month study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 17(6): 771-776, 2014