+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Screening for Oxidative Stress Elicited by Engineered Nanomaterials: Evaluation of Acellular DCFH Assay



Screening for Oxidative Stress Elicited by Engineered Nanomaterials: Evaluation of Acellular DCFH Assay



Dose-Response 10(3): 308-330



The DCFH assay is commonly used for measuring free radicals generated by engineered nanomaterials (ENM), a well-established mechanism of ENM toxicity. Concerns exist over susceptibility of the DCFH assay to: assay conditions, adsorption of DCFH onto ENM, fluorescence quenching and light scattering. These effects vary in magnitude depending on ENM physiochemical properties and concentration. A rigorous evaluation of this method is still lacking. The objective was to evaluate performance of the DCFH assay for measuring ENM-induced free radicals. A series of diverse and well-characterized ENM were tested in the acellular DCFH assay. We investigated the effect of sonication conditions, dispersion media, ENM concentration, and the use of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) on the DCFH results. The acellular DCFH assay suffers from high background signals resulting from dye auto-oxidation and lacks sensitivity and robustness. DCFH oxidation is further enhanced by HRP. The number of positive ENM in the assay and their relative ranking changed as a function of experimental conditions. An inverse dose relationship was observed for several Carbon-based ENM. Overall, these findings indicate the importance of having standardized assays for evaluating ENM toxicity and highlights limitations of the DCFH assay for measuring ENM-induced free radicals.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055670839

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22942866

DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.10-036.Pal


Related references

Evaluation of red blood cell lysing solutions in the study of neutrophil oxidative burst by the DCFH assay. Cytometry 43(4): 290-296, April 1, 2001

Dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) assay: a quantitative method for oxidative stress assessment of nanoparticle-treated cells. Toxicology in Vitro 27(2): 954-963, 2013

An in vitro liver model--assessing oxidative stress and genotoxicity following exposure of hepatocytes to a panel of engineered nanomaterials. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 9(): 28-28, 2013

An in vitro assessment of panel of engineered nanomaterials using a human renal cell line: cytotoxicity, pro-inflammatory response, oxidative stress and genotoxicity. Bmc Nephrology 14: 96-96, 2014

Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID. Nanotoxicology 10(9): 1229-1242, 2016

Mechanism of neutrophil activation and toxicity elicited by engineered nanomaterials. Toxicology in Vitro 29(5): 1172-1184, 2016

Assessment of the toxic potential of engineered metal oxide nanomaterials using an acellular model: citrated rat blood plasma. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 26(8): 601-610, 2016

The current state of engineered nanomaterials in consumer goods and waste streams: the need to develop nanoproperty-quantifiable sensors for monitoring engineered nanomaterials. Nanotechnology, Science and Applications 4: 73-86, 2011

Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials. Acs Nano 5(3): 1805-1817, 2011

Mapping the biological oxidative damage of engineered nanomaterials. Small 9(9-10): 1853-1865, 2013

A weight of evidence approach for hazard screening of engineered nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 8(1): 72-87, 2014

Lab-on-a-chip-based high-throughput screening of the genotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials. Small 10(13): 2721-2734, 2015

Applications of the comet assay in particle toxicology: air pollution and engineered nanomaterials exposure. Mutagenesis 30(1): 67-83, 2015

Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 8(): 9-9, 2011