+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Should nasal high-frequency ventilation be used in preterm infants?



Should nasal high-frequency ventilation be used in preterm infants?



Acta Paediatrica 97(11): 1484-1485




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055764292

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18754830

DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01016.x


Related references

High frequency jet ventilation versus high frequency oscillatory ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016(5): Cd010548, 2016

Randomized comparison of high-frequency ventilation with high-rate intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory failure. Journal of Pediatrics 135(1): 39-46, 1999

High frequency oscillatory ventilation was not more effective than conventional ventilation in preterm infants. Evidence-BasedNursing6(2):41, 2003

High frequency oscillatory ventilation vs pressure support ventilation plus volume guarantee in preterm infants with RDS. Pediatric Research 49(4 Part 2): 405A, 2001

Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000(2): Cd000438, 2000

Rescue high-frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for severe pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015(10): Cd000437, 2015

Randomised controlled trial comparing high frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation in preterm infants. Pediatric Research 47(4 Part 2): 379A, 2000

Elective high frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000(2): Cd000328, 2000

Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Neonatology 103(1): 7-8; Discussion 8-9, 2013

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015(3): Cd000104, 2015

Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Journal of Clinical Neonatology 1(3): 121-123, 2012

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009(3): Cd000104, 2009

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007(3): Cd000104, 2007

High frequency oscillatory ventilation compared to conventional mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatric Research 37(4 Part 2): 347A, 1994