+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery (SITUS) versus Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized comparative study of performance with novices in a dry laboratory



Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery (SITUS) versus Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized comparative study of performance with novices in a dry laboratory



World Journal of Urology 33(1): 51-57



To evaluate the Single-Incision Transumbilical Surgery (SITUS) technique as compared to an established laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) technique (Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery, SPLS) and conventional laparoscopy (CLS) in a surgical simulator model. Sixty-three medical students without previous laparoscopic experience were randomly assigned to one of the three groups (SITUS, SPLS and CLS). Subjects were asked to perform five standardized tasks of increasing difficulty adopted from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery curriculum. Statistical evaluation included task completion times and accuracy. Overall performances of all tasks (except precision cutting) were significantly faster and of higher accuracy in the CLS and SITUS groups than in the SPLS group (p = 0.004 to p < 0.001). CLS and SITUS groups alone showed no significant difference in performance times and accuracy measurements for all tasks (p = 0.048 to p = 0.989). SITUS proved to be a simple, but highly effective technique to overcome restrictions of SPLS. In a surgical simulator model, novices were able to achieve task performances comparable to CLS and did significantly better than using a port-assisted LESS technique such as SPLS. The demonstrated advantages of SITUS may be attributed to a preservation of the basic principles of conventional laparoscopy, such as the use of straight instruments and an adequate degree of triangulation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 055796161

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24562315

DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1266-9


Related references

Assessment of treatment options for rectosigmoid cancer: single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 31(6): 2437-2450, 2017

Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Adnexal Lesions: ASingle Center Experience in China. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 22(6s): S39, 2016

Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety. Chinese Medical Journal 129(11): 1305-1310, 2016

Pre-bent instruments used in single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparative study of performance in a dry lab. Surgical Endoscopy 26(7): 1924-1930, 2012

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: preliminary experience and comparison to conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery. Bmc Surgery 14: 105, 2014

Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparison of surgical port performance in a surgical simulator with novices. Surgical Endoscopy 25(7): 2210-2218, 2011

Short-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy 33(3): 840-848, 2019

Acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skills is different comparing conventional laparoscopic and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a single-centre, prospective randomized study. Surgical Endoscopy 30(8): 3386-3390, 2016

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials only exploring the role of single incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal resections. Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology 3: 30, 2018

Single port/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy 29(1): 77-85, 2015

Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 82(3): 172-178, 2012

A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 16: 539, 2015

Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. American Journal of Surgery 202(3): 254-258, 2011

Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease. Surgical Endoscopy 29(7): 1850-1855, 2015

Quality of Life after Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Gynecologic Disease. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 20(6): S35-S36, 2013