+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Spontaneous pre-labour rupture of membranes at term: immediate versus delayed induction of labour



Spontaneous pre-labour rupture of membranes at term: immediate versus delayed induction of labour



West African Journal of Medicine 28(3): 156-160



Spontaneous pre-labour rupture of membranes (SPROM) at term is one of the most common complications of pregnancy. It is an important cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality, particularly because it is associated with a latency period from membrane rupture to delivery. To compare the outcome of labour in women who had immediate induction of labour, with those who had delayed induction following SPROM at term. A prospective case control study of 200 women who had either immediate induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol tablets, or delayed induction with intravenous oxytocin infusion after an expectant period of 12 hours, at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. The outcome of labour was compared in the two groups using the Z test and Chi square test, while, p-value of less than 0.05 was taken as significant. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval were also determined where appropriate. Immediate induction of labour with intravaginal misoprotol resulted in lower rates of caesarean section and operative vaginal delivery, with a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. The duration of latent phase of labour and hospital stay before delivery was statistically significantly shorter in the immediate induction group. Neonatal and maternal morbidity were insignificant and comparable between the two groups. Immediate induction of labour with intravaginal misoprotol resulted in significantly lower rates of intervention without compromising fetomaternal outcome. We recommend the immediate induction of labour with proper use of intravaginal misoprotol in women with SPROM at term.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 055890730

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20306730


Related references

Management of premature rupture of the membranes after 34 weeks' gestation -- early versus delayed induction of labour. South African Medical Journal 86(3): 264-268, 1996

Induction of labour versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: an economic evaluation. TERMPROM Study Group. Term Prelabour Rupture of the Membranes. Cmaj 157(11): 1519-1525, 1997

Clinical trial comparing artificial rupture of membranes plus oral PGE2 tablets versus artificial rupture of membranes plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour in primigravid patients at term. Ulster Medical Journal 65(2): 145-148, 1996

Sublingual versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in prelabour rupture of membranes at term. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan 20(4): 242-245, 2010

Prelabour rupture of membranes at term: Early induction of labour versus expectant management. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive Biology 70(2): 129-133, 1996

Effectiveness and Safety of 2-Hourly 20 Mcg Oral Misoprostol Solution Compared to Standard Intravenous Oxytocin in Labour Induction Due to Pre-Labour Rupture of Membranes at Term: a Randomised Clinical Trial at Kenyatta National Hospital. East African Medical Journal 91(9): 303-310, 2014

Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 38(2): 167-171, 2018

Induction of labour with a favourable cervix and/or pre-labour rupture of membranes. Best Practice and Research. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 17(5): 795-809, 2003

Artificial rupture of membranes in spontaneous labour at term. Midwives Chronicle 105(1251): 76-78, 1992

Induction of labour by prostaglandin pessaries or oxytocin infusion after spontaneous rupture of membranes. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 4(3): 185-187, 1984

24 hour rhythm in the timing of pre-labour spontaneous rupture of membranes at term. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 112(2): 151-153, 2004

Prelabour rupture of membranes at term: the role of induction of labour. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 10(2): 61-68, 1998

Induction of labour with oral misoprostol for prelabour rupture of membranes at term. Jpma. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 55(5): 180-183, 2005

The outcomes of trial of labour after cesarean section following induction of labour compared to spontaneous labour. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 287(6): 1099-1103, 2013

The induction of labour with prostaglandin F2alpha by intravenous infusion. II. A comparison of fetal and maternal acid-base values with those found in oxytocin induced labour and in spontaneous labour. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement 37: 27-34, 1974