+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation: From Risk Assessment to Routine, Multidisciplinary Treatment Evaluation



Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation: From Risk Assessment to Routine, Multidisciplinary Treatment Evaluation



International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 62(5): 1281-1299



Besides assessment of forensic patients' risk of future violence and criminogenic needs, knowledge on their responsivity to treatment is equally important. However, instruments currently used for risk assessment are not sensitive enough for treatment evaluation. Therefore, the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation (IFTE) was developed. The IFTE is a treatment evaluation tool, which uses the dynamic risk items of the Dutch risk assessment tool, the HKT-R (Historical, Clinical, Future-Revised). The IFTE has an extended answering scale, which makes it more sensitive for measuring change and enables clinicians to monitor patients' responsivity to treatment closely. This study examines the concurrent and predictive validity of the IFTE. We found moderate to strong correlations between IFTE items and HKT-30 items (the HKT-30 is the predecessor of the HKT-R), with work and therapy attendance, and positive drug tests. In addition, we found moderate to modest correlations between some IFTE items and work and therapy attendance in a 6-month follow-up period and modest to high discriminative power for some IFTE items for violence and drug use 6 months after the measurement. Given its good reliability and validity properties, and comprehensive but short-term nature, implementation of the IFTE in forensic practice likely improves individual treatment of forensic psychiatric patients and has high potential for risk management purposes.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056045237

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29536757

DOI: 10.1177/0306624x16676100


Related references

Routine Outcome Monitoring and Clinical Decision-Making in Forensic Psychiatry Based on the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation. Plos One 11(8): E0160787, 2017

Forensic psychiatric treatment evaluation: The clinical evaluation of treatment progress with repeated forensic routine outcome monitoring measures. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 57: 9-16, 2018

Forensic psychiatric treatment evaluation: The clinical evaluation of treatment progress with repeated forensic routine outcome monitoring measures. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 57: 9-16, 2018

Concurrent and predictive validity of indicator scales developed for the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation interview schedule. Journal of Gerontology 39(2): 158-165, 1984

Predicting short term intramural violence with the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation (IBFE), ROM-instrument in tbs for different target groups. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie 60(10): 662-671, 2018

Risk assessment and treatment evaluation by means of two forensic observation instruments. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie 49(4): 221-232, 2007

The Predictive Validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) in a Secure Forensic Hospital: Risk Factors and Strengths. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 10(4): 337-345, 2011

Advances in Assessment and Treatment of Forensic Populations || The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (Sara) Guide: Reliability and Validity in Adult Male Offenders. Law and Human Behavior 24(1): 101-118, 2000

The importance of counties: Examining the predictive validity of a state juvenile risk assessment instrument. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 55(6): 377-395, 2016

Can the clinical items of the risk assessment instrument HKT-30 predict to what extent forensic patients will break agreements during the resocialisation phase of treatment?. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie 54(5): 429-438, 2012

Internal consistency, factor structure, and concurrent validity of the treatment evaluation inventory. Psychological Reports 101(3 Pt 1): 731-738, 2008

Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 32(6): 509-520, 2014

Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) during residential treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 31(3): 263-271, 2008

Testing the Reliability and Validity of the Risk, Sophistication-Maturity, and Treatment Amenability Instrument (RST-i): An Assessment Tool for Juvenile Offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2(2): 101-117, 2003

Predictive validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability for violent behavior in outpatient forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment 27(2): 377-391, 2016