+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Systematic review of efficacy for manual lymphatic drainage techniques in sports medicine and rehabilitation: an evidence-based practice approach



Systematic review of efficacy for manual lymphatic drainage techniques in sports medicine and rehabilitation: an evidence-based practice approach



Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 17(3): E80-E89



Manual therapists question integrating manual lymphatic drainage techniques (MLDTs) into conventional treatments for athletic injuries due to the scarcity of literature concerning musculoskeletal applications and established orthopaedic clinical practice guidelines. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide manual therapy clinicians with pertinent information regarding progression of MLDTs as well as to critique the evidence for efficacy of this method in sports medicine. We surveyed English-language publications from 1998 to 2008 by searching PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus databases using the terms lymphatic system, lymph drainage, lymphatic therapy, manual lymph drainage, and lymphatic pump techniques. We selected articles investigating the effects of MLDTs on orthopaedic and athletic injury outcomes. Nine articles met inclusion criteria, of which 3 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We evaluated the 3 RCTs using a validity score (PEDro scale). Due to differences in experimental design, data could not be collapsed for meta-analysis. Animal model experiments reinforce theoretical principles for application of MLDTs. When combined with concomitant musculoskeletal therapy, pilot and case studies demonstrate MLDT effectiveness. The best evidence suggests that efficacy of MLDT in sports medicine and rehabilitation is specific to resolution of enzyme serum levels associated with acute skeletal muscle cell damage as well as reduction of edema following acute ankle joint sprain and radial wrist fracture. Currently, there is limited high-ranking evidence available. Well-designed RCTs assessing outcome variables following implementation of MLDTs in treating athletic injuries may provide conclusive evidence for establishing applicable clinical practice guidelines in sports medicine and rehabilitation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056092291

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20046617

DOI: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.80E


Related references

Unravelling confusion in sports medicine and sports science practice: a systematic approach to using the best of research and practice-based evidence to make a quality decision. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2017, 2017

A real-world approach to Evidence-Based Medicine in general practice: a competency framework derived from a systematic review and Delphi process. Bmc Medical Education 17(1): 78, 2018

Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. British Journal of Sports Medicine 50(24): 1506-1515, 2016

Beyond the evidence-based practice paradigm to achieve best practice in rehabilitation medicine: a clinical review. Pm and R 1(10): 941-950, 2010

Does evidence-based medicine training improve doctors' knowledge, practice and patient outcomes? A systematic review of the evidence. Medical Teacher 2018: 1-7, 2018

Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 41(13): 1024-1032, 2009

Manual lymphatic drainage and quality of life in patients with lymphoedema and mixed oedema: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Quality of Life Research 27(6): 1403-1414, 2018

Effects of manual lymphatic drainage on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 11: 15, 2013

Knowledge, attitudes and practice of physicians toward evidence-based medicine: A systematic review. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 11(4): 246-251, 2018

Factors related to episiotomy practice: an evidence-based medicine systematic review. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2019: 1-11, 2019

A process for the systematic review of community-based rehabilitation evaluation reports: formulating evidence for policy and practice. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. Internationale Zeitschrift für Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue Internationale de Recherches de Readaptation 29(1): 27-30, 2006

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and rehabilitation: taking stock of evidence based medicine: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 30(6): 843-847, 2018

Evidence-based medicine. 3. Systematic reviews: a tool for clinical practice, permanent education and health policy decisions. Italian Group on Evidence-Based Medicine-GIMBE. Recenti Progressi in Medicina 89(6): 329-337, 1998

Infographic. Unravelling confusion in sports medicine and science practice: a systematic approach. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2019, 2019

Systematic Review of Psychosocial Interventions for People With Spinal Cord Injury During Inpatient Rehabilitation: Implications for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 14(6): 499-506, 2017