+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Systematic reviews of preclinical animal studies can make significant contributions to health care and more transparent translational medicine



Systematic reviews of preclinical animal studies can make significant contributions to health care and more transparent translational medicine



Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014(3): Ed000078




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 056093500

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24719910


Related references

Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research. Plos Medicine 10(7): E1001482, 2014

Systematic reviews of animal studies; missing link in translational research?. Plos One 9(3): E89981, 2015

The usefulness of systematic reviews of animal experiments for the design of preclinical and clinical studies. Ilar Journal 55(3): 427-437, 2015

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments. Laboratory Animals 45(4): 225-230, 2012

Towards evidence-based translational research: the pros and cons of conducting systematic reviews of animal studies. Altex 30(2): 256-257, 2013

A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies, to fully integrate the Three Rs, and to make systematic reviews more feasible. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 38(2): 167-182, 2010

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Pain Physician 12(5): 819-850, 2009

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies. Pain Physician 12(6): 929-963, 2010

Using multiple types of studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions--a systematic review. Plos One 8(12): E85035, 2014

Decisions about lumping vs. splitting of the scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions are not well justified: a case study in systematic reviews of health care professional reminders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65(7): 756-763, 2012

Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 323(7305): 157-162, 2001

Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. BMJ 323(7306): 224-228, 2001

Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri-food public health. Research Synthesis Methods 7(4): 433-446, 2016

Sex Bias Is Increasingly Prevalent in Preclinical Cardiovascular Research: Implications for Translational Medicine and Health Equity for Women: A Systematic Assessment of Leading Cardiovascular Journals Over a 10-Year Period. Circulation 135(6): 625-626, 2018

Uncontrolled sepsis: a systematic review of translational immunology studies in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2(1): 6, 2015