+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The Dutch health insurance reform: switching between insurers, a comparison between the general population and the chronically ill and disabled



The Dutch health insurance reform: switching between insurers, a comparison between the general population and the chronically ill and disabled



Bmc Health Services Research 8: 58



On 1 January 2006 a number of far-reaching changes in the Dutch health insurance system came into effect. In the new system of managed competition consumer mobility plays an important role. Consumers are free to change their insurer and insurance plan every year. The idea is that consumers who are not satisfied with the premium or quality of care provided will opt for a different insurer. This would force insurers to strive for good prices and quality of care. Internationally, the Dutch changes are under the attention of both policy makers and researchers. Questions answered in this article relate to switching behaviour, reasons for switching, and differences between population categories. Postal questionnaires were sent to 1516 members of the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel and to 3757 members of the National Panel of the Chronically ill and Disabled (NPCD) in April 2006. The questionnaire was returned by 1198 members of the Consumer Panel (response 79%) and by 3211 members of the NPCD (response 86%). Among other things, questions were asked about choices for a health insurer and insurance plan and the reasons for this choice. Young and healthy people switch insurer more often than elderly or people in bad health. The chronically ill and disabled do not switch less often than the general population when both populations are comparable on age, sex and education. For the general population, premium is more important than content, while the chronically ill and disabled value content of the insurance package as well. However, quality of care is not important for either group as a reason for switching. There is increased mobility in the new system for both the general population and the chronically ill and disabled. This however is not based on quality of care. If reasons for switching are unrelated to the quality of care, it is hard to believe that switching influences the quality of care. As yet there are no signs of barriers to switch insurer for the chronically ill and disabled. This however could change in the future and it is therefore important to monitor changes.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056179074

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18366678

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-58


Related references

Regulated competition in health care: switching and barriers to switching in the Dutch health insurance system. Bmc Health Services Research 11: 95, 2011

Empowering the chronically ill? Patient collectives in the new Dutch health insurance system. Health Policy 84(2-3): 162-169, 2007

Consumer choice in Dutch health insurance after reform. Health Care Analysis 14(1): 37-49, 2006

Comparison of oral health between inpatients with schizophrenia and disabled people or the general population. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 111(4): 214-219, 2012

Healthcare financing reform in Latvia: switching from social health insurance to NHS and back?. Health Policy 118(2): 147-152, 2014

What people really know about their health insurance: a comparison of information obtained from individuals and their insurers. American Journal of Public Health 90(6): 924-928, 2000

Anticipating reform, health insurers get creative. Canada-America health care plan; HIPC-like reform in Florida. Health Systems Review 26(3): 20-20, 1993

RISK CORRIDORS AND REINSURANCE IN HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACES: Insurance for Insurers. American Journal of Health Economics 2(1): 66-95, 2016

Health system reform in the Czech Republic. Policy lessons from the initial experience of the general health insurance company. JAMA 271(23): 1870-1874, 1994

Higher, faster, more! The draft of the law to reform statutory health insurance as of the year 2000 (statutory health insurance health care reform 2000), breaking negative records. Der Internist 40(10): M304-M306, 1999

The Reform of Social Health Insurance from the Viewpoint of the General Practitioner. Medizinische Klinik 58: 1437-1441, 1963

Comparison of prescriptions by pediatricians and general practitioners: a population-based study in Franche-Comté from the database of Regional Health Insurance Fund. Archives de Pediatrie 12(12): 1688-1696, 2005

The association of the SF-36 health status survey with 1-year socioeconomic outcomes in a chronically disabled spinal disorder population. Spine 24(20): 2162-2170, 1999

Joint statement of the umbrella organisations of health insurance companies on the draft of law to the statutory health insurance health care reform 2000. Der Internist 40(10): M293-M297, 1999

Out of options: why so many workers in small businesses lack affordable health insurance, and how health care reform can help. Findings from the Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2007. Issue Brief 67: 1-22, 2009