+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial II: comparison of clipping vs coiling: key questions. Are the results of the study generalizable? Should clipping be done for patients less than 40 years of age?



The International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial II: comparison of clipping vs coiling: key questions. Are the results of the study generalizable? Should clipping be done for patients less than 40 years of age?



Surgical Neurology 70(1): 104-107




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056193297

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18589206

DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.04.019


Related references

International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366(9488): 809-817, 2005

International subarachnoid aneurysm trial of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling: subgroup analysis of 278 elderly patients. Stroke 39(10): 2720-2726, 2008

Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 38(5): 1538-1544, 2007

Surgical nuances of clipping after coiling: looking beyond the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 19(5): 638-642, 2013

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 11(6): 304-314, 2007

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomised trial. Lancet (North American Edition) 360(9342): 1267-1274, 2002

Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet. Neurology 8(5): 427-433, 2009

The effect of clipping and coiling in acute severe subarachnoid hemorrhage after international subarachnoid aneurysmal trial (ISAT) results. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 48(4): 224-227, 2005

Occurrence and impact of delayed cerebral ischemia after coiling and after clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Journal of Neurology 259(4): 679-683, 2012

Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms after the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial. United Kingdom experience. Neurosciences 14(2): 118-123, 2009

Outcome of surgical clipping for ruptured, low-grade, anterior circulation cerebral aneurysms: should clipping be omitted after International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial?. Surgical Neurology 64(6): 504-9, Discussion 509-10, 2005

International subarachnoid aneurysm trial 2009: endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms has no significant advantage over neurosurgical clipping. Neurosurgery 66(5): 961-962, 2010

The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 385(9969): 691-697, 2015

Evaluation of time to aneurysm treatment following subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of patients treated with clipping versus coiling. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery 8(4): 373-377, 2016

Health disparities in time to aneurysm clipping/coiling among aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: a national study. World Neurosurgery 82(6): 1071-1076, 2015