+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: overview and methodology for assessment of validity



The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: overview and methodology for assessment of validity



Journal of Orofacial Pain 24(1): 7-24



The purpose of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Validation Project was to assess the diagnostic validity of this examination protocol. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the project's methodology, descriptive statistics, and data for the study participant sample. This article also details the development of reliable methods to establish the reference standards for assessing criterion validity of the Axis I RDC/TMD diagnoses. The Axis I reference standards were based on the consensus of two criterion examiners independently performing a comprehensive history, clinical examination, and evaluation of imaging. Intersite reliability was assessed annually for criterion examiners and radiologists. Criterion examination reliability was also assessed within study sites. Study participant demographics were comparable to those of participants in previous studies using the RDC/TMD. Diagnostic agreement of the criterion examiners with each other and with the consensus-based reference standards was excellent with all kappas > or = 0.81, except for osteoarthrosis (moderate agreement, k = 0.53). Intrasite criterion examiner agreement with reference standards was excellent (k > or = 0.95). Intersite reliability of the radiologists for detecting computed tomography-disclosed osteoarthrosis and magnetic resonance imaging-disclosed disc displacement was good to excellent (k = 0.71 and 0.84, respectively). The Validation Project study population was appropriate for assessing the reliability and validity of the RDC/TMD Axis I and II. The reference standards used to assess the validity of Axis I TMD were based on reliable and clinically credible methods.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 056214308

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20213028


Related references

The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. III: validity of Axis I diagnoses. Journal of Orofacial Pain 24(1): 35-47, 2010

Validity of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I in clinical and research settings. Journal of Orofacial Pain 23(1): 9, 2009

Reliability and validity of Axis I of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) with proposed revisions. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 37(10): 744-759, 2010

Reliability and Validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis I in Clinical and Research Settings: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Oral and Facial Pain and Headache 32(1): 7-18, 2018

Longitudinal outcome of temporomandibular disorders: a 5-year epidemiologic study of muscle disorders defined by research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Orofacial Pain 17(1): 9-20, 2003

Masticatory muscle disorders diagnostic criteria: the American Academy of Orofacial Pain versus the research diagnostic criteria/temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD). Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 39(12): 941-947, 2013

Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders discovered incidentally during routine dental examination using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 125(3): 250-259, 2018

Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in an Adult Brazilian Community Population Using the Research Diagnostic Criteria (Axes I and II) for Temporomandibular Disorders (The Maringá Study). International Journal of Prosthodontics 28(6): 600-609, 2015

Prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in children in the State of Puebla, Mexico, evaluated with the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD). Acta Odontologica Latinoamericana 23(3): 228-233, 2010

Comorbidity between depression and anxiety in patients with temporomandibular disorders according to the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Oral and Facial Pain and Headache 29(2): 135-143, 2015

Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the research diagnostic criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Scales: depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain. Journal of Orofacial Pain 16(3): 207-220, 2002

Validity of clinical diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 91(1): 50-55, 2001

Subtyping patients with temporomandibular disorders in a primary health care setting on the basis of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders axis II pain-related disability: a step toward tailored treatment planning?. Journal of Oral and Facial Pain and Headache 29(2): 126-134, 2015

The association between research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder findings and biting force and endurance in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Pain Medicine 2(1): 35-45, 2001

Validity of clinical diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: clinical versus magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of temporomandibular joint internal derangement and osteoarthrosis. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 91(1): 50-55, 2001