+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The disease management program for type 2 diabetes in Germany enhances process quality of diabetes care - a follow-up survey of patient's experiences



The disease management program for type 2 diabetes in Germany enhances process quality of diabetes care - a follow-up survey of patient's experiences



Bmc Health Services Research 10: 55



In summer 2003 a disease management program (DMP) for type 2 diabetes was introduced on a nationwide basis in Germany. Patient participation and continuity of care within the DMP are important factors to achieve long-term improvements in clinical endpoints. Therefore it is of interest, if patients experience any positive or negative effects of the DMP on their treatment that would support or hamper further participation. The main objective of the study was to find out if the German Disease Management Program (DMP) for type 2 diabetes improves process and outcome quality of medical care for patients in the light of their subjective experiences over a period of one year. Cohort study with a baseline interview and a follow-up after 10.4 +/- 0.64 months. Data on process and outcome measures were collected by telephone interviews with 444 patients enrolled and 494 patients not enrolled in the German DMP for type 2 diabetes. Data were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analyses. DMP enrolment was significantly associated with a higher process quality of care. At baseline enrolled patients more often reported that they had attended a diabetes education course (OR = 3.4), have > or = 4 contacts/year with the attending physician (OR = 3.3), have at least one annual foot examination (OR = 3.1) and one referral to an ophthalmologist (OR = 3.4) and possess a diabetes passport (OR = 2.4). Except for the annual referral to an ophthalmologist these parameters were also statistically significant at follow-up. In contrast, no differences between enrolled and not enrolled patients were found concerning outcome quality indicators, e.g. self-rated health, Glycated hemoglobin (GHb) and blood pressure. However, 16-36% of the DMP participants reported improvements of body weight and/or GHb and/or blood pressure values due to enrolment - unchanged within one year of follow-up. In the light of patient's experiences the DMP enhances the process quality of medical care for type 2 diabetes in Germany. The lack of significant differences in outcome quality between enrolled and not enrolled patients might be due to the short program duration. Our data suggest that the DMP for type 2 diabetes should not be withdrawn unless an evidently more promising approach is found.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056289890

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20199685

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-55


Related references

Improvement of the quality of diabetes control and decrease in the concentrations of AGE-products in patients with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a 10 year-prospective, population-based survey on the quality of diabetes care in Germany (JEVIN). European Journal of Medical Research 9(8): 391-399, 2004

Comorbidity and patient-reported quality of care: an evaluation of the primary care based German disease management program for type 2 diabetes. Journal of Public Health 20(1): 41-46, 2012

AGE-products N-epsilon-Carboxymethyllysine and pentosidine in patients with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus Results from a 10 year-prospective, population-based survey on the quality of diabetes care in Germany. Diabetologia 45(Supplement 2): A 355-A 356, 2002

Impact of a diabetes disease management program on diabetes control and patient quality of life. Population Health Management 15(1): 12-19, 2012

Telemedicine-based diabetes disease management program to support out-patient diabetes care. Diabetologia 46(Supplement 2): A 426, 2003

Model-based disease management program to support diabetes care in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes & Metabolism 29(Hors serie 2): 4S25, 2003

Is the number of documented diabetes process-of-care indicators associated with cardiometabolic risk factor levels, patient satisfaction, or self-rated quality of diabetes care? The Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care 29(9): 2108-2113, 2006

Effects of a diabetes self-management program on glycemic control, coronary heart disease risk, and quality of life among Thai patients with type 2 diabetes. Nursing and Health Sciences 9(2): 135-141, 2007

Structured diabetes therapy and education improves the outcome of patients with insulin treated diabetes mellitus. The 10 year follow-up of a prospective, population-based survey on the quality of diabetes care (the JEVIN Trial). Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes 114(1): 18-27, 2006

Comparison of a diabetes CD-ROM program, diabetes video game and diabetes Kids Class in diabetes management and knowledge acquisition in children ages 5-10 with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 48(SUPPL 1): A73, 1999

The quality of life of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and impact on quality of diabetes care JEVIN, a population-based survey. Diabetologia 44(Supplement 1): A258, 2001

Diabetes care organization, process, and patient outcomes: effects of a diabetes control program. Diabetes Educator 17(1): 42-48, 1991

Process evaluation of a patient-centred, patient-directed, group-based education program for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutrition and Dietetics: the Journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia 74(3): 243-252, 2017

Evaluation of a diabetes patient education program consisting of a three-day hospitalization and a six-month follow-up by telephone counseling for mild type 2 diabetes and IGT. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 4(3): 122-129, 1999

How do people with diabetes describe their experiences in primary care? Evidence from 85,760 patients with self-reported diabetes from the English General Practice Patient Survey. Diabetes Care 38(3): 469-475, 2015