+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case



The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case



Behavioral Sciences & the Law 28(3): 303-321



Community members reporting for jury duty (N = 128) read a sexual harassment trial summary in which harassment severity and the organization's sexual harassment policy and response were manipulated. Jurors who read the severe harassment scenario were more likely to agree that the plaintiff had suffered and should be compensated for her suffering and that the organization should be punished than were jurors who read the mild harassment scenario. When the organization had and enforced a sexual harassment policy, jurors believed that the plaintiff had suffered little and the organization should not be punished compared with conditions in which the organization did not have an enforced sexual harassment policy. Harassment severity influenced jurors' compensatory awards, and organizational behavior influenced jurors' punitive awards. These results have implications for plaintiffs, who must decide whether to claim specific or garden-variety damages; organizations, which could create or modify sexual harassment policy to limit damages; and trial lawyers, who could tailor arguments to maximize or minimize awards.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056320823

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19579260

DOI: 10.1002/bsl.886


Related references

Sexual harassment: the hostile work environment. Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly 33(2): 88-92, 1992

Protesting sexual harassment. Was this a hostile work environment. Nursing 28(9): 82-82, 1998

The Sexual Harassment-Suicide Connection in the U.S. Military: Contextual Effects of Hostile Work Environment and Trusted Unit Leaders. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 2017, 2017

Sexual harassment claims stem from a hostile work environment. Personnel journal 69(8): 88, 1990

Psychological effects of sexual harassment, appraisal of harassment, and organizational climate among U.S. Army soldiers. Military Medicine 163(2): 63-67, 1998

The influence of sexual harassment frequency and perceptions of organizational justice on victim responses to sexual harassment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 20(6): 729-754, 2011

Hostile-environment sexual harassment. Journal of Cardiovascular Management 5(5): 12-3, 16, 1994

Gender influence on perceptions of hostile environment sexual harassment. Psychological Reports 77(1): 79-82, 1995

Situational and Individual Influences on Judgments of Hostile Environment Sexual Harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(7): 1395-1415, 1999

Sexual harassment in healthcare: classification of harassers and rationalizations of sex-based harassment behavior. Journal of Nursing Administration 31(11): 534-543, 2001

Cross-level, three-way interactions among work-group climate, gender, and frequency of harassment on morale and withdrawal outcomes of sexual harassment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 82(1): 159-182, 2009

Sexual harassment in the workplace. How female food service workers react to hostile work environments. Health Care Food and Nutrition Focus 17(3): 12, 2001

Who Says It's Sexual Harassment? The Effects of Gender and Likelihood to Sexually Harass on Legal Judgments of Sexual Harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35(4): 745-772, 2005

Physician's abuse of female hospital employees may be 'hostile environment' sexual harassment. Kopp v. Samaritan Health System, Inc. Healthspan 11(1): 18-19, 1993

The utility of the reasonable woman legal standard in hostile environment sexual harassment cases: A multimethod, multistudy examination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5(3): 596-629, 1999