+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The effects of regulation and litigation on a large for-profit nursing home chain

The effects of regulation and litigation on a large for-profit nursing home chain

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 39(4): 781-809

This article examines the effects of state regulation and civil class action litigation on corporate compliance with nurse staffing and quality standards, corporate strategies to manage staffing and quality, and corporate financial status of a large for-profit nursing home chain. A historical case study was used to examine multiple public data sources, focusing on facilities in California from 2003 to 2011 during and after regulatory actions and litigation. The results showed that the state issued numerous deficiencies for violations of the nurse staffing and quality standards with minimal impact on quality compliance with state law. A class action jury trial found that the chain violated the state's minimum staffing standard on one-third of the total days during a six-year period and awarded a $677 million verdict. A court settlement and supervised injunction resulted in compliance with minimum staffing and some improvement in quality measures, but quality levels remained below the average California facilities. The litigation also had some negative financial impact on Skilled Healthcare Group's California facilities and parent company. Civil litigation had more impact on the chain than the regulatory oversight.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056323735

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24842973

DOI: 10.1215/03616878-2743039

Related references

Failure to Meet Nurse Staffing Standards: A Litigation Case Study of a Large US Nursing Home Chain. Inquiry 55: 46958018788686-46958018788686, 2018

Tenure, certification, and education of nursing home administrators, medical directors, and directors of nursing in for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: United States 2004. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 10(6): 423-430, 2009

Marketization in Long-Term Care: A Cross-Country Comparison of Large For-Profit Nursing Home Chains. Health Services Insights 10: 1178632917710533-1178632917710533, 2017

Nursing home survey: for-profit nursing home systems consolidate; beds grow by 18%. Modern Healthcare 12(6): 74, 76, 78-74, 76, 78, 1982

Home health nursing care: a comparison of not-for-profit and for-profit agencies. Home Health Care Services Quarterly 12(1): 23-36, 1990

Nursing home performance in resident care in the United States: is it only a matter of for-profit versus not-for-profit?. Health Economics, Policy, and Law 3(Pt 2): 115-140, 2008

Shareholder value and the performance of a large nursing home chain. Health Services Research 43(3): 1062-1084, 2008

Maximizing profit and endangering health: corporate strategies to avoid litigation and regulation. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 11(4): 338-348, 2005

Nursing home 'abuse' litigation is instructive. Geriatrics 55(2): 11, 15-6, 2000

Nursing home litigation: a vicious cycle. Journal of Family Practice 63(9): 493-493, 2015

Overview of the nursing home litigation process. Geriatric Nursing 23(1): 37-42, 2002

The impact of litigation on nursing home quality. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 29(1): 11-42, 2004

Knowles II ruling may limit nursing home litigation. Florida Nurse 48(3): 22-22, 2002

Malpractice litigation and nursing home quality of care. Health Services Research 48(6 Pt 1): 1920-1938, 2014

Lessons from nursing home dysphagia malpractice litigation. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 36(3): 41-46, 2010