+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The effects of "effort after meaning" on recall: differences in within- and between-subjects designs



The effects of "effort after meaning" on recall: differences in within- and between-subjects designs



Memory and Cognition 37(4): 447-463



In four experiments, we examined free recall of ambiguous sentences with or without corresponding cues to facilitate comprehension, using Auble and Franks's (1978) paradigm to examine effort after meaning (Bartlett, 1932). The ambiguous sentences were studied without cues, with cues meaningfully embedded in them, with cues provided shortly before the sentence (precue), or with cues following the sentence after several seconds (delayed cue). When these conditions were manipulated within subjects, the process of cue integration in the pre- and delayed-cue conditions enhanced recall, relative to the no-cue and embedded-cue conditions. Furthermore, in a test condition in which subjects first attempted to recall the cues alone, recall was also best in the delayed-cue condition. The effects described above did not occur when the cue presentation conditions varied between subjects, and on a test of order reconstruction, there was even an advantage for sentences studied in the embedded-cue condition over those studied in the delayed-cue condition. The dissociative effects of experimental design on sentence recall and order reconstruction suggest that effort after meaning might enhance memory for study items at the cost of impairing memory for temporal order information.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056325907

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19460952

DOI: 10.3758/mc.37.4.447


Related references

Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36(2): 552-557, 2010

The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: Perceptual interference and multiple recall tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(2): 375-382, 2002

Age differences in cognitive effort in recall. Journal of Gerontology 38(6): 695-700, 1983

Visual word recognition: Effort after meaning but not (necessarily) meaning after effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23(5): 1314-1322, 1997

The role of choice in learning as a function of meaning and between- and within-subjects designs. Journal of Experimental Psychology 94(2): 235-238, 1972

Developmental differences in the mental effort requirements for the use of an organizational strategy in free recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 44(1): 109-125, 1987

Can the effects of temporal grouping explain the similarities and differences between free recall and serial recall?. Memory and Cognition 43(3): 469-488, 2016

Assessing information integration processes: a comparison of findings obtained with between-subjects designs versus within-subjects designs. Quality & Quantity 52(4): 1977-1988, 2018

The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall. Memory & Cognition 6(1): 20-25, 1978

Effects of cognitive effort in word recall. Japanese Journal of Psychology 57(3): 149-155, 1986

Recall bias for seven-day recall measurement of alcohol consumption among emergency department patients: implications for case-crossover designs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 68(2): 303-310, 2007

Recall in the thematic apperception test; an experimental investigation into the meaning of recall of phantasy with reference to personality diagnosis. Journal of Personality 14: 41-46, 2011

Dream recall in healthy subjects at home and in sleep laboratories Are there any differences?. Journal of Sleep Research 9(Suppl. 1): 166, 2000

Effects on verbal recall of blocking trigrams of similar connotative meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 85(1): 11-15, 1970

Discovering a meaning versus applying the keyword method: Effects on recall. Contemporary Educational Psychology 12(2): 156-175, 1987