+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The efficacy of subcostal-approach laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous midline incisions: comparative analysis with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy



The efficacy of subcostal-approach laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous midline incisions: comparative analysis with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy



Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part a 24(12): 842-845



In patients with previous abdominal surgery, difficulties in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are associated with adhesions from the previous surgery. We reported the efficacy of a subcostal-approach LC (SALC) in patients with previous midline incisions. Thirty-five patients with previous upper midline incision who underwent SALC from 2009 to 2013 at Korea University Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) were included. In SALC, a subcostal incision instead of an umbilical one was used to avoid adhesion in the midline scar. We compared the clinical outcomes of SALC with those of conventional LC in patients with previous midline incisions. In the SALC group, there were 25 men and 10 women. The mean age was 64 years. Median operative time was 60 minutes, and the median length of postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. Most of the patients underwent three-port cholecystectomy. Three patients underwent conversion to open surgery. The SALC group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay and shorter operation time compared with the conventional LC (with supraumbilical incision) group. SALC is a safe and effective procedure for patients who have had a previous midline incision that can help prevent unnecessary adhesiolysis.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056327435

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24927482

DOI: 10.1089/lap.2014.0117


Related references

Subcostal approach laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. Anz Journal of Surgery 80(9): 670, 2010

Single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy in uncomplicated gallbladder diseases: a retrospective comparative analysis with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Yonsei Medical Journal 54(6): 1471-1477, 2013

Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. American Journal of Surgery 202(3): 254-258, 2011

Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 32(6): 475-481, 2017

Comparative study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional hospital stay. Cirugia Espanola 91(7): 424-431, 2014

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part a 21(1): 25-28, 2011

Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Surgical Endoscopy 18(3): 379-382, 2004

Comparative study: single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional three-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 96(9): 1143-1146, 2013

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy 31(9): 3437-3448, 2017

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 16(8): 1618-1628, 2012

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World Journal of Surgery 36(11): 2644-2653, 2012

Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 16(9): 1790-1801, 2012

Efficacy of the subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Comparison with conventional port-site infiltration. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 28(3): 339-343, 2012

Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy. World Journal of Surgery 38(1): 25-32, 2014

Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed in the Elderly and Younger Patients: Should We Abstain from Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly?. Cureus 10(6): E2888, 2018