+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The individualisation of a dog bite mark: a case study highlighting the bite mark analysis, with emphasis on differences between dog and human bite marks

The individualisation of a dog bite mark: a case study highlighting the bite mark analysis, with emphasis on differences between dog and human bite marks

International Journal of Legal Medicine 126(3): 441-446

A person who keeps or controls a dog in his own interest is liable "without fault" should that dog cause harm to any person. By owning a dog, man welcomes into his home a beast that preserves much of its primordial self, and is capable of inflicting a fatal bite wound. The courts may require the forensic expert to identify which specific dog caused the damage or fatal bite in an effort to establish the owner/controller of the animal. Very little has been published on the individualisation of dog bite marks, the procedures to be followed when confronted with usable bite marks and the range of analysis techniques available. The authors advocate a multidisciplinary approach, and utilise a case study to demonstrate the protocol to be followed when analysing a dog bite mark. The paper also highlights differences between human and dog inflicted bites. The authors warn against over interpretation of poor quality bite marks and a final conclusion of absolute certainty.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056378118

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21538224

DOI: 10.1007/s00414-011-0575-4

Related references

Bite mark evidence: bite mark analysis is not the same as bite mark comparison or matching or identification. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 4(3): 617-622, 2017

Not all bite marks are associated with abuse, sexual activities, or homicides: a case study of a self-inflicted bite mark. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32(3): 788-792, 1987

The case for better bite and bite mark preservations. Journal of Dentistry 5(3): 259-260, 1977

Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 2; "SCIP" and bite marks in skin and foodstuffs. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology 13(2): 26-32, 1995

The use of human skin in the fabrication of a bite mark template: two case reports. Journal of Forensic Sciences 35(6): 1477-1485, 1990

Computerized axial tomography as an aid in bite mark analysis: a case report. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32(1): 266-272, 1987

A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences 49(1): 111-118, 2004

Physical signs for the general dental practitioner. Case 55. Human bite-mark. Dental Update 35(5): 356, 2008

Bite mark analysis. Journal 85(4): 19-23, 2007

Bite-Mark Analysis. Journal of the California Dental Association 43(9): 486, 2015

More on bite-mark analysis. Pediatric Dentistry 16(6): 402, 1994

Solarisation as an aid to bite mark analysis. International Journal of Forensic Dentistry 3(10): 31-33, 1976

Guidelines for bite mark analysis. Journal of the American Dental Association 112(4): 383-386, 1986

3D imaging for bite mark analysis. The Imaging Science Journal 61(4): 351-360, 2013

Bite mark lesions in human skin. Forensic Science International 18(1): 41-56, 1981