+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study



The learners' perspective on internal medicine ward rounds: a cross-sectional study



Bmc Medical Education 10: 53



Ward rounds form an integral part of Internal Medicine teaching. This study aimed to determine the trainees' opinions regarding various aspects of their ward rounds, including how well they cover their learning needs, how they would like the rounds to be conducted, and differences of opinion between medical students and postgraduates. A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 134 trainees in Internal Medicine, comprising medical students, interns, residents and fellows, who were asked to fill in a structured, self-designed questionnaire. Most of the responses required a rating on a scale of 1-5 (1 being highly unsatisfactory and 5 being highly satisfactory). Teaching of clinical skills and bedside teaching received the lowest overall mean score (Mean +/- SD 2.48 +/- 1.02 and 2.49 +/- 1.12 respectively). They were rated much lower by postgraduates as compared to students (p < 0.001). All respondents felt that management of patients was the aspect best covered by the current ward rounds (Mean +/- SD 3.71 +/- 0.72). For their desired ward rounds, management of patients received the highest score (Mean +/- SD 4.64 +/- 0.55), followed by bedside examinations (Mean +/- SD 4.60 +/- 0.61) and clinical skills teaching (Mean +/- SD 4.50 +/- 0.68). The postgraduates desired a lot more focus on communication skills, counselling and medical ethics as compared to students, whose primary focus was teaching of bedside examination and management. A majority of the respondents (87%) preferred bedside rounds over conference room rounds. Even though the duration of rounds was found to be adequate, a majority of the trainees (68%) felt there was a lack of individual attention during ward rounds. This study highlights important areas where ward rounds need improvement in order to maximize their benefit to the learners. There is a need to modify the current state of ward rounds in order to address the needs and expectations of trainees.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056394613

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20618929

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-53


Related references

WORKFORCE: Newly graduated doctors' experiences of conducting medical ward rounds alone: A regional cross-sectional study. Future Healthcare Journal 6(1): 47-51, 2019

Ward rounds in internal medicine: Validation of an Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) observation checklist. Gms Journal for Medical Education 35(2): Doc17, 2018

Communication during ward rounds in internal medicine. An analysis of patient-nurse-physician interactions using RIAS. Patient Education and Counseling 67(3): 343-348, 2007

Self-reported colorectal cancer screening of Medicare beneficiaries in family medicine vs. internal medicine practices in the United States: a cross-sectional study. Bmc Gastroenterology 12: 23, 2012

Measuring the use of the population perspective on internal medicine attending rounds. Academic Medicine 70(11): 1047-1049, 1995

Cross-sectional study at the departments of internal medicine 2000/2001. Ugeskrift for Laeger 164(40): 4669-4672, 2002

Empathy in Internal Medicine Residents at Community-based Hospitals: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development 5: 2382120518771352, 2018

Medical student preferences for the internal medicine residency interview day: A cross-sectional study. Plos one 13(7): E0199382, 2018

Study of nursing in England. 7. Men's ward of internal medicine and a surgical ward. Kangogaku Zasshi 43(7): 770-772, 1979

Romanian version of SDM-Q-9 validation in Internal Medicine and Cardiology setting: a multicentric cross-sectional study. Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine 57(2): 195-200, 2019

Characteristics of short general internal medicine hospital stays: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Cmaj Open 7(1): E47-E54, 2019

Awareness regarding venous thromboembolism among internal medicine practitioners in Mexico: a national cross-sectional study. Internal Medicine Journal 42(12): 1335-1341, 2012

Clinical and biological features associated with taste loss in internal medicine patients. A cross-sectional study of 100 cases. Appetite 44(2): 163-169, 2005

Itch in the General Internal Medicine Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study of Prevalence and Quality-of-Life Effects. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 17(6): 681-690, 2016

Prevalence and Costs of Discharge Diagnoses in Inpatient General Internal Medicine: a Multi-center Cross-sectional Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine 33(11): 1899-1904, 2018