+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The use of the 'borderline' category in the reporting of cervical cytopathology in the UK: results of a survey conducted under the aegis of the British Society for Clinical Cytology



The use of the 'borderline' category in the reporting of cervical cytopathology in the UK: results of a survey conducted under the aegis of the British Society for Clinical Cytology



Cytopathology 19(3): 167-171



To determine how the 'borderline' category was used by cytopathologists in the UK when reporting cervical smears. A questionnaire was sent by email to members of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. There is wide variation in the use of the 'borderline' category in the UK but the majority of respondents (77.6%) used it when reporting smears that were either on the borderline between negative and low grade squamous dyskaryosis ('borderline ?low grade'), or on the borderline between negative and high grade squamous dyskaryosis ('borderline ?high grade'), or on the borderline between negative and glandular dyskaryosis 'borderline ?glandular dyskaryosis'). A significant minority (15.7%), however, did not use 'borderline' when reporting smears that showed an abnormality that was possibly high grade squamous dyskaryosis. A majority (79.1%) of respondents thought that it would be useful to have separate reporting categories for 'borderline ?low grade' and 'borderline ?high grade'. There is diversity in the use of the category 'borderline' in the UK. The proposed revised BSCC terminology with separate categories for borderline ?low grade, borderline ?high grades and borderline ? glandular dyskaryosis reflects the opinion of the majority of respondents to the questionnaire.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056528893

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18241204

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00548.x


Related references

Automation in cytology: A survey conducted by the New Technology Task Force, Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology. Diagnostic Cytopathology 18(1): 47-55, 1998

Pre-analytical quality in fluid samples cytopathology: Results of a survey from the French Society of Clinical Cytology. Annales de Pathologie 35(5): 378-386, 2016

Review of the state of the art and recommendations of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for urinary cytology procedures and reporting : the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Practice Guidelines Task Force. Diagnostic Cytopathology 30(1): 24-30, 2003

Terminology in gynaecological cytopathology: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. Journal of Clinical Pathology 39(9): 933-944, 1986

Recommended code of practice for laboratories providing a cytopathology service 1997. British Society for Clinical Cytology. Cytopathology 8(Suppl. 1): 1-25, 1997

Do borderline nuclear changes in gynaecological cytology constitute a reliable reporting category?. Cytopathology 13(4): 220-231, 2002

Problems of cell nomenclature in cervical cytology smears. Recommendations of a working party of the British Society for Clinical Cytology. Journal of Clinical Pathology 31(12): 1226-1227, 1978

Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the grading of squamous cell dyskaryosis, as the British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment. Cytopathology 16(4): 179-192, 2005

Risk of malignancy in the categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology. Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology 8(3): 120-127, 2019

Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intraepithelial lesions and dyskaryosis as the Bethesda System and British Society for Clinical Cytology definitions require amendment. Cytopathology 16(4): 165-166, 2005

Cervical Cytology Practice Guidelines. American Society of Cytopathology. Acta Cytologica 45(2): 201-226, 2001

Implementing the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology terminology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology refines risk of malignancy in pancreatic specimens. Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology 8(3): 117-119, 2019

American Society of Cytopathology statement on new technologies in cervical cytology screening. June 2000. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 22(4): 351-351, 2000

ASC statement on new technologies in cervical cytology screening (June 2000). American Society of Cytopathology. Diagnostic Cytopathology 23(6): 430-430, 2000

Current Cytology Practices in Korea: A Nationwide Survey by the Korean Society for Cytopathology. Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 51(6): 579-587, 2017