+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Three-armed trials including placebo and no-treatment groups may be subject to publication bias: systematic review



Three-armed trials including placebo and no-treatment groups may be subject to publication bias: systematic review



Plos One 6(5): E20679



It has been argued that placebos may not have important clinical impacts in general. However, there is increasing evidence of a publication bias among trials published in journals. Therefore, we explored the potential for publication bias in randomized trials with active treatment, placebo, and no-treatment groups. Three-armed randomized trials of acupuncture, acupoint stimulation, and transcutaneous electrical stimulation were obtained from electronic databases. Effect sizes between treatment and placebo groups were calculated for treatment effect, and effect sizes between placebo and no-treatment groups were calculated for placebo effect. All data were then analyzed for publication bias. For the treatment effect, small trials with fewer than 100 patients per arm showed more benefits than large trials with at least 100 patients per arm in acupuncture and acupoint stimulation. For the placebo effect, no differences were found between large and small trials. Further analyses showed that the treatment effect in acupuncture and acupoint stimulation may be subject to publication bias because study design and any known factors of heterogeneity were not associated with the small study effects. In the simulation, the magnitude of the placebo effect was smaller than that calculated after considering publication bias. Randomized three-armed trials, which are necessary for estimating the placebo effect, may be subject to publication bias. If the magnitude of the placebo effect is assessed in an intervention, the potential for publication bias should be investigated using data related to the treatment effect.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 056568457

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21655196


Related references

Does Publication Bias Inflate the Apparent Efficacy of Psychological Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of US National Institutes of Health-Funded Trials. Plos One 10(9): E0137864, 2016

Efficacy of antidepressants over placebo is similar in two-armed versus three-armed or more-armed randomized placebo-controlled trials. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 33(2): 66-72, 2017

Placebo effect was influenced by publication year in three-armed acupuncture trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 20(1-2): 83-92, 2012

Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias. Bmj 331(7514): 433-434, 2005

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. Plos One 8(7): E66844, 2014

Is the placebo powerless? Update of a systematic review with 52 new randomized trials comparing placebo with no treatment. Journal of Internal Medicine 256(2): 91-100, 2004

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. Plos One 3(8): E3081, 2008

A systematic review of adverse events in placebo groups of anti-migraine clinical trials. Pain 146(3): 261-269, 2010

Acupuncture treatment for pain: systematic review of randomised clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups. Bmj 338: A3115, 2009

A systematic review of trial methodology, using the placebo groups of randomized controlled trials in paediatric postoperative pain. Pain 116(1-2): 146-158, 2005

Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Safety 32(11): 1041-1056, 2009

Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: mandatory publication of data may help. Bmj 331(7517): 638-638, 2005

Time to full publication of studies of anti-cancer medicines for breast cancer and the potential for publication bias: a short systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 12(32): Iii, Ix-X, 1-46, 2008

Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active intervention. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 9: 1, 2009

Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: studies on publication bias are probably susceptible to the bias they study. Bmj 331(7517): 637-638, 2005