EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Treatment of syphilis in HIV-infected subjects: a systematic review of the literature



Treatment of syphilis in HIV-infected subjects: a systematic review of the literature



Sexually Transmitted Infections 87(1): 9-16



The optimal antimicrobial regimen to treat syphilis in HIV-infected subjects remains controversial. To systematically assess the literature for studies evaluating syphilis treatment regimens in this population. Two reviewers independently assessed studies published between 1980 and June 2008 in electronic databases, trial registries and bibliographies (with no language restrictions) for content and quality. Studies that included 10 or more people, with documented HIV status, type and duration of syphilis treatment and at least 6 months of follow-up were included. The primary outcome was syphilis serological or clinical failure stratified by syphilis stage. Of 1380 unique citations, 23 studies (22 published papers and 1 conference abstract) were included in the systematic review. Owing to the significant heterogeneity among studies, pooled summary statistics could not be generated. The range of probabilities for serological failure with 2.4 million units (MU) of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G (BPG) was 6.9% (95% CI 2.6% to 14.4%) to 22.4% (11.7% to 36.6%); that of 7.2 MU of BPG in late latent syphilis was 19.4% (11.9% to 28.9%) to 31.1% (22.3% to 40.9%) and failure estimates with 18-24 MU of aqueous penicillin for the treatment of neurosyphilis were 27.3% (6.0% to 61.0%) to 27.8% (14.2% to 45.2%). The optimal antimicrobial regimen to treat syphilis in HIV-infected subjects is unknown; guideline recommendations in this population are based on little objective data.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056679678

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20924048

DOI: 10.1136/sti.2010.043893



Related references

Orthodontic treatment in periodontitis-susceptible subjects: a systematic literature review. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research 2(2): 162-173, 2018

Ocular syphilis among HIV-infected patients: a systematic analysis of the literature. Sexually Transmitted Infections 87(1): 4-8, 2011

Socioeconomic status (SES) as a determinant of adherence to treatment in HIV infected patients: a systematic review of the literature. Retrovirology 5: 13-13, 2008

A systematic review of syphilis serological treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons: rethinking the significance of serological non-responsiveness and the serofast state after therapy. Bmc Infectious Diseases 15(): 479-479, 2016

Benzathine penicillin G for the management of early syphilis among HIV co-infected persons: A systematic review. Canada Communicable Disease Report 42(2): 30-36, 2018

Bone involvement in secondary syphilis: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 41(9): 532-537, 2015

Medical medullary syndrome and meningovascular syphilis: a case report in an HIV-infected man and a review of the literature. Neurology 44(12): 2231-2235, 1994

Predictors of lack of serological response to syphilis treatment in HIV-infected subjects. Journal of the International Aids Society 17(4 Suppl 3): 19654-19654, 2014

The problem of treatment-resistant syphilis With special reference to ars-phenamine-resistant syphilis Review of the literature and experimental study. 1936

Malignant syphilis in a patient infected by human immunodeficiency virus. Case report and literature review. Revista Chilena de Infectologia 29(6): 678-681, 2013

Systematic review to establish the safety profiles for direct and indirect inhibitors of p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinases for treatment of cancer. A systematic review of the literature. Medical Oncology 25(3): 323-330, 2008

Treatment of syphilis: a systematic review. JAMA 312(18): 1905-1917, 2014

What are the differences between a literature search, a literature review, a systematic review and a meta-analysis? And why is a systematic review considered to be so good?. Irish Medical Journal 106(2 Suppl): 8-10, 2013

Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Periodontology 81(6): 801-808, 2010

Treatment of late benign syphilis: review of the literature. Journal of the American Venereal Disease Association 3(2 Pt 2): 146-147, 1976