+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study



Use of buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction in children: a retrospective cohort study



Bmc Urology 14: 46



The use of buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) for urethral reconstruction has increased in popularity over the last several decades. Our aim was to describe our institutional experience with and outcomes after BMG urethroplasty. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of boys undergoing BMG urethral reconstruction. Preoperative and perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Twenty-nine patients (median age 8.2 years) underwent BMG urethroplasty from 1995-2012. Of the 10 patients undergoing 1-stage repairs, 6 had tubularized grafts, the last of which was performed in 2000 due to an unacceptably high revision rate (100%). A 2-stage approach was elected for 19 patients (median follow-up 21.3 months). Complications including stricture, fistula, or chordee were seen in 60% of patients completing both stages and 32% required ≥1 revision. However, 71% of 2-stage patients were free of significant problems at last follow-up. We found BMG to be a reasonable option for use in complex pediatric urethral reconstruction. Tubularized grafts had poor results, and we no longer use them. We favor a 2-stage approach for all patients except those with "simple" non-hypospadiac strictures. Although revision procedures were not uncommon, the majority of patients were ultimately free of long-term problems.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056795206

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24902693

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-46


Related references

Anterior urethral reconstruction in adults with re-do and/or primary severe urethral defects The use of local skin grafts and buccal mucosa. European Urology 37(Suppl 2): 60, 2000

Urethral reconstruction with buccal mucosa and colonic mucosa onlay grafts: experiment with dogs. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 86(45): 3207-3210, 2006

Buccal mucosa grafts in reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Journal of Urology 155(5 Suppl. ): 502A, 1996

Buccal mucosa grafts in adult bulbar urethral reconstruction Five-year experience. Journal of Urology 161(4 Suppl. ): 101, 1999

Developing improved tissue-engineered buccal mucosa grafts for urethral reconstruction. Canadian Urological Association Journal 12(5): E234-E242, 2018

Urethral reconstruction using buccal mucosa or penile skin grafts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urologia Internationalis 89(4): 387-394, 2012

Urethral reconstruction using buccal mucosa urethroplasty in the treatment of urethral injury. Hinyokika Kiyo. Acta Urologica Japonica 51(5): 343-346, 2005

A new option for the management of urethral trauma: primary reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption with a buccal mucosa transplant. International Urology and Nephrology 37(3): 521-523, 2005

Large urethral diverticulum presenting as a scrotal mass: urethral reconstruction with ventral onlay buccal mucosa. Journal of Urology 171(1): 351-352, 2004

A comparative study of buccal mucosa graft and penile pedical flap for reconstruction of anterior urethral strictures. Chinese Medical Journal 123(3): 365-368, 2010

Buccal mucosal grafts for urethral reconstruction. Urology. 51(5a Suppl.): 15-19,, 1998

Intraoral wound closure with tissue-engineered mucosa: new perspectives for urethra reconstruction with buccal mucosa grafts. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 107(1): 25-33, 2001

Urethral reconstruction with buccal mucosa graft. European Urology Suppl.s 2(1): 205, 2003

Urethral reconstruction using buccal mucosa transplants. Der Urologe. Ausg. a 52(5): 650-656, 2013

Re: results of buccal mucosa grafts for repairing long bulbar urethral strictures. Journal of Urology 185(2): 569-570, 2016