+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation

Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation

Health Policy 89(3): 261-270

To explore decision-making and the use of economic evaluation at the local health care decision-making level in England (UK). Data collection was over a 16-month period (January 2003 to April 2004). Data collection comprised 29 in-depth interviews with a range of decision makers, 13 observations of decision-making meetings, and analysis of documents produced at meetings. A constant comparative approach was used to identify broad themes and sub-themes arising from the data. Data were analysed using Microsoft Word. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance provides the main way in which economic evaluation is used at a local level in the UK, although following NICE guidance is often regarded as detrimental to pursuing local priorities. Other than through NICE, economic evaluation is not considered at the local level; we found no evidence for use at the meeting group (by individuals). Although decision makers appear to understand notions of scarcity, with some also referring to value for money, the process of decision-making departs from these principles in practice. Disinvestment decisions are not made nor are decisions weighted against pre-defined criteria. Options appraisal is conducted, but it does not embody the principles of economic evaluation, since options are not considered in terms of their costs and benefits and opportunity cost is not accounted for. There appear to be two reasons why economic evaluation is not used at the local level: (1) the nature of management decisions concerned with the employment of extra staff and new equipment, rather than the choice of medicines or specific interventions usually assessed in published economic evaluation; (2) lack of awareness of the economic evaluation approach to decision-making. These two factors point to a lack of freedom in decision-making at the local level and a lack of understanding of how priority setting can be achieved in practice. A more detailed and rigorous approach to prioritisation at the local level is required. Whilst, PCTs have been given greater responsibility for priority setting, they lack the necessary power and understanding of the ways in which long term solutions to problems in health care can be achieved. Economics can be a valuable asset to priority setting and has already filtered into the jargon used by decision makers. Whilst most concepts are understood, the leap to adopting these concepts into the practice of decision-making needs to be made.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 056796984

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18657336

DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.06.004

Related references

Health services economic evaluation: the investigation before decision making. Revista Espanola de Salud Publica 78(3): 293-295, 2004

Economic evaluation and health care decision-making. Health Policy 36(3): 215-229, 1996

How health economic evaluation (HEE) contributes to decision-making in public health care: the case of Brazil. Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen 108(7): 405-412, 2014

Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making?. Health Economics 15(7): 677-687, 2006

Discounting and decision making in the economic evaluation of health-care technologies. Health Economics 20(1): 2, 2011

Health-care decision-making processes in Latin America: problems and prospects for the use of economic evaluation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 21(1): 1-14, 2005

Economic evaluation to inform health care decision-making: promise, pitfalls and a proposal for an alternative path. Social Science and Medicine 72(6): 832-839, 2011

Economic evaluation and decision-making in health. The role of economic evaluation in the adoption and spread of health technologies. 2008 SESPAS Report. Gaceta Sanitaria 22(Suppl. 1): 137-142, 2008

Access to medium secure psychiatric care in England and Wales. 2: A qualitative study of admission decision-making. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 15(1): 32-49, 2004

Processes of local alcohol policy-making in England: Does the theory of policy transfer provide useful insights into public health decision-making?. Health and Place 57: 358-364, 2019

Economic Evaluation for The Decision Making Process of Implementing of Pharmaceutical Care for The Treatment of Hypertension In The Brazilian Health System: Stage I - Direct-Costs Analysis. Value in Health 18(7): A831, 2015

A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making. Health Policy 86(2-3): 129-141, 2008

Multimorbidity, clinical decision making and health care delivery in New Zealand Primary care: a qualitative study. Bmc Family Practice 18(1): 51, 2017

Who should be involved in health care decision making? A qualitative study. Health Care Analysis 16(2): 114-126, 2008

Decision-making in job attendance within health care--a qualitative study. Occupational Medicine 66(3): 247-251, 2016