+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Validation and reliability of the German version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in primary care back pain patients



Validation and reliability of the German version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in primary care back pain patients



Psycho-SocialMedicine1:Doc07



In 1992 Von Korff and his co-workers developed a simple, brief questionnaire to assess the severity of chronic pain problems, the Chronic Pain Grade (CPG). The present study was conducted to analyse the psychometric properties of the translated German version of the CPG within a population of primary care back pain patients (n=130). Factor analysis yielded two factors which accounted for 72% of the variance of the questionnaire. The first factor 'Disability Score' (53.56% of the variance) revealed a good internal consistency (alpha=.88), the internal consistency of the second factor 'Characteristic Pain Intensity' was moderate (alpha=.68). The reliability of the whole instrument was good (alpha=.82). The CPG and its subscales show moderate to high relations with other instruments assessing the patient's disability (FFbH-R, Pain Disability Index PDI). Additionally weak to moderate but significant correlations were found between the CPG and other measures of grading and staging chronic pain (MPSS, RGS). Further, positive correlations between the CPG and both, the frequency of doctor visits and the frequent use of pain medication have been seen. The reported findings suggest, that the German version of the CPG is a reliable, valid and useful instrument if a brief, simple method of grading the severity of chronic pain is needed. The German version leads to a better comparability between German and English language studies and facilitates an international collaboration in this field of research.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 056833762

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19742049


Related references

THU0631-HPRValidation of the Swedish Version of Start Back Tool Against the Short Version of The Rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in Patients with Back and/or Neck Pain in Primary Health Care. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 74(Suppl 2): 1319.2-1319, 2015

The Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS) - validation, factor structure and comparison to the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) and other validated measures in German chronic back pain patients. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders 16: 171, 2015

Validation of the French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Revue du Rhumatisme 65(2): 126-134, 1998

Development of the Italian version of the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire in patients with chronic low back pain: cross-cultural adaptation, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. Internationale Zeitschrift für Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue Internationale de Recherches de Readaptation 37(3): 205-211, 2014

Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire in patients with low back pain. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 45(4): 527-535, 2009

Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity for Patients With Low Back Pain. Spine 43(6): E357-E364, 2018

Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Clinical Rheumatology 25(5): 619-631, 2006

Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale and Pain Disability Index. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 18(1-2): 37-44, 2005

Validation of a French version of Roland-Morris questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 56(9-10): 613-620, 2013

Translation and validation of the German version of the Bournemouth questionnaire for low back pain. Chiropractic and Manual Therapies 21(1): 32, 2013

Test-retest reliability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Situational Pain Scale in patients with chronic low back pain. Swiss Medical Weekly 143: W13903, 2013

Development of the Italian Version of the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire in Subjects with Chronic Low Back Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability and Validity. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 23(2): 214-223, 2016

Measuring disability of patients with low-back pain--validation of a German version of the Roland & Morris disability questionnaire. Schmerz 14(6): 392-400, 2000

Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Agreement, Responsiveness, and Minimal Important Change for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine 43(20): 1438-1445, 2018

Measuring psychosocial variables in patients with (sub) acute low back pain complaints, at risk for chronicity: a validation study of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version. Spine 35(4): 447-452, 2010