+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

X-ray magnetic resonance fusion modality may reduce radiation exposure and contrast dose in diagnostic cardiac catheterization of congenital heart disease

X-ray magnetic resonance fusion modality may reduce radiation exposure and contrast dose in diagnostic cardiac catheterization of congenital heart disease

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 84(5): 795-800

Radiation exposure in the pediatric population may increase the risk of future malignancy. Children with congenital heart disease who often undergo repeated catheterizations are at risk. One possible strategy to reduce radiation is to use X-ray Magnetic Resonance Fusion (XMRF) to facilitate cardiac catheterization. Catheterization data of patients who underwent diagnostic XMRF procedures between January 1, 2009 and February 1, 2012 were reviewed. Cases were matched 1:1 to contemporary controls who did not undergo XMRF based on weight and diagnosis and were compared in radiation exposure, contrast dose, and procedural and anesthesia times. Forty-four matched pairs were included. Baseline demographics were similar in both groups. Patients in the XMRF group had lower indices of radiation exposure measured by fluoroscopy time (14 vs. 16.4 vs. P = 0.047), dose-area product from fluoroscopy (513.2 vs. 589.1 µGy·m(2) , P = 0.042), total dose-area product (625.8 vs. 995.2 µGy·m(2) , P = 0.027), and total air kerma dose (94.5 vs. 153.8 mGy, P = 0.017). There was also a significant reduction in contrast dose (2 vs. 3.3 cc/kg, P <0.001). Procedural time tended to be shorter in the XMRF group but anesthesia time was significantly longer. Select diagnostic cardiac catheterization cases that utilized XMRF used less radiation and contrast than similar cases where XMRF was not used. Future work is needed to determine whether similar benefits can be extended to other types of diagnostic and complex interventional procedures.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 056966745

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24619541

DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25473

Related references

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease as an alternative to diagnostic invasive cardiac catheterization: a single center experience. Congenital Heart Disease 8(4): 322-327, 2014

X-ray magnetic resonance fusion to internal markers and utility in congenital heart disease catheterization. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging 4(4): 415-424, 2011

Radiation dose benchmarks during cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease in the United States. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 7(9): 1060-1069, 2015

A high dose of dexmedetomidine using the BIS monitor™ for diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization in a toddler with congenital heart disease. Journal of Anesthesia 26(2): 254-258, 2012

A Prospective Evaluation of Contrast and Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Cardiac CT in Children with Complex Congenital Heart Disease using Low-concentration Iodinated Contrast Agent and Low Tube Voltage and Current. British Journal of Radiology (): 20160669-20160669, 2016

Estimation of radiation dose and risk to children undergoing cardiac catheterization for the treatment of a congenital heart disease using Monte Carlo simulations. Pediatric Radiology 43(3): 339-346, 2013

Diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography in combination with adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. American Heart Journal 166(6): 999-1009, 2014

Can simple echocardiographic measures reduce the number of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies to diagnose right ventricular enlargement in congenital heart disease?. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 25(5): 518-523, 2012

Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Cardiac Procedures and Malignancy Risk in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. Circulation, 2017

Radiation exposure of patients and radiologic personnel during cardiac catheterization and contrast medium demonstration of the heart and great vessels. II. Measurement by an apparatus for a biplanar picture series in a large film size and 1 cassette changer. Exposure to dispersed radiation in the examiner with protective clothing. Strahlentherapie 129(2): 295-307, 1966

Cardiac catheterization--A diagnostic aid in congenital heart disease. Northwest Medicine 50(3): 170-175, 1951

Safety and observer variability of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging combined with low-dose dobutamine stress-testing in patients with complex congenital heart disease. International Journal of Cardiology 147(2): 214-218, 2011

Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation From Cardiac Procedures in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: 15-Year Data From a Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort. Circulation 133(1): 12-20, 2016

A comparison of cardiac output by thoracic impedance and direct fick in children with congenital heart disease undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 25(5): 776-779, 2012

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in congenital heart disease. Radiologia 51(3): 261-272, 2010