+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A Simple Method for Differentiating Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion/Empyema from Parapneumonic Effusion Using the Split Pleura Sign and the Amount of Pleural Effusion on Thoracic CT



A Simple Method for Differentiating Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion/Empyema from Parapneumonic Effusion Using the Split Pleura Sign and the Amount of Pleural Effusion on Thoracic CT



Plos one 10(6): E0130141



Pleural separation, the "split pleura" sign, has been reported in patients with empyema. However, the diagnostic yield of the split pleura sign for complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE)/empyema and its utility for differentiating CPPE/empyema from parapneumonic effusion (PPE) remains unclear. This differentiation is important because CPPE/empyema patients need thoracic drainage. In this regard, the aim of this study was to develop a simple method to distinguish CPPE/empyema from PPE using computed tomography (CT) focusing on the split pleura sign, fluid attenuation values (HU: Hounsfield units), and amount of fluid collection measured on thoracic CT prior to diagnostic thoracentesis. A total of 83 consecutive patients who underwent chest CT and were diagnosed with CPPE (n=18)/empyema (n=18) or PPE (n=47) based on the diagnostic thoracentesis were retrospectively analyzed. On univariate analysis, the split pleura sign (odds ratio (OR), 12.1; p<0.001), total amount of pleural effusion (≥30 mm) (OR, 6.13; p<0.001), HU value≥10 (OR, 5.94; p=0.001), and the presence of septum (OR, 6.43; p=0.018), atelectasis (OR, 6.83; p=0.002), or air (OR, 9.90; p=0.002) in pleural fluid were significantly higher in the CPPE/empyema group than in the PPE group. On multivariate analysis, only the split pleura sign (hazard ratio (HR), 6.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.91-23.5; p=0.003) and total amount of pleural effusion (≥30 mm) on thoracic CT (HR, 7.48; 95%CI, 1.76-31.8; p=0.006) were risk factors for empyema. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the presence of both split pleura sign and total amount of pleural effusion (≥30 mm) on thoracic CT for CPPE/empyema were 79.4%, 80.9%, 75%, and 84.4%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.801 on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. This study showed a high diagnostic yield of the split pleura sign and total amount of pleural fluid (≥30 mm) on thoracic CT that is useful and simple for discriminating between CPPE/empyema and PPE prior to diagnostic thoracentesis.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057044127

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26076488

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130141


Related references

From pneumonic infiltration to parapneumonic effusion--from effusion to pleural empyema: internal medicine aspects of parapneumonic effusion development and pleural empyema. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 153(15-16): 349-353, 2003

Role of pleural fluid C-reactive protein concentration in discriminating uncomplicated parapneumonic pleural effusions from complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema. Lung 184(3): 141-145, 2006

Treatment of complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and pleural parapneumonic empyema. Medical Science Monitor 18(7): Cr443-9, 2012

Complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema: pleural decortication and video-assisted thoracic surgery. Current Infectious Disease Reports 10(3): 236-240, 2008

Usefulness of serum lactate dehydrogenase/pleural fluid adenosine deaminase ratio for differentiating Mycoplasma pneumoniae parapneumonic effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion. Journal of Infection 75(6): 581-583, 2017

Neutrophilic Loculated Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: Incidence, Characteristics and Differentiation From Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 351(2): 153-159, 2016

Causes and risk factors of pleural empyema and complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion. Medicina 46(2): 113-119, 2010

Parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema. Respiration; International Review of Thoracic Diseases 75(3): 241-250, 2008

Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker in differentiating parapneumonic effusion from tuberculous pleurisy or malignant effusion. Clinical Biochemistry 46(15): 1484-1488, 2013

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of community-acquired thoracic empyema or complicated parapneumonic effusion caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 29(8): 1003-1010, 2010

Parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema thoracis. Atemwegs- und Lungenkrankheiten 24(9): 416-424, 1998

Childhood parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema. Journal of Medicine 33(1-4): 265-268, 2002

Parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema in childhood. Journal of Emergency Medicine 24(4): 474-476, 2003

Complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema in children. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection 39(6): 483-488, 2006

Alteplase: pleural effusion (parapneumonic) and empyema in children. Hospital Pharmacy 48(11): 912-921, 2013