EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

A comparative analysis of multiple sequence alignments for biological data



A comparative analysis of multiple sequence alignments for biological data



Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 26 Suppl 1: S1781-9



Multiple sequence alignment plays a key role in the computational analysis of biological data. Different programs are developed to analyze the sequence similarity. This paper highlights the algorithmic techniques of the most popular multiple sequence alignment programs. These programs are then evaluated on the basis of execution time and scalability. The overall performance of these programs is assessed to highlight their strengths and weaknesses with reference to their algorithmic techniques. In terms of overall alignment quality, T-Coffee and Mafft attain the highest average scores, whereas K-align has the minimum computation time.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057055638

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26405947

DOI: 10.3233/BME-151479



Related references

Sequence Diversity Diagram for comparative analysis of multiple sequence alignments. Bmc Proceedings 8(Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Symposium on Biologica): S9-S9, 2014

Revealing highly conserved regions in the E6 protein among distinct human papillomavirus types using comparative analysis of multiple sequence alignments. Brazilian Journal of Biology 73(2): 449-450, 2014

Advantages of using multiple sequence alignments over pairwise alignments when sequence similarity is low. Abstracts of Papers American Chemical Society 203(1-3): BIOL60, 1992

Relationship between multiple sequence alignments and quality of protein comparative models. Proteins 58(1): 151-157, 2004

The choice of sequence homologs included in multiple sequence alignments has a dramatic impact on evolutionary conservation analysis. Bioinformatics, 2018

Building multiple sequence alignments with a flavor of HSSP alignments. Genetics and Molecular Research 5(1): 127-137, 2006

Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments. Journal of Molecular Biology 264(4): 823-838, 1996

An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments. Journal of Molecular Biology 301(3): 691-711, 2000

ESPript: Analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics (Oxford) 15(4): 305-308, April, 1999

Exploratory analysis of multiple sequence alignments using phylogenies. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 10(3): 243-247, 1994

Creation and analysis of protein multiple sequence alignments. Methods of Biochemical Analysis 43: 215-232, 2001

Exploratory visual analysis of conserved domains on multiple sequence alignments. Bmc Bioinformatics 10 Suppl 11(): S7-S7, 2010

Analysis of multiple genomic sequence alignments: a web resource, online tools, and lessons learned from analysis of mammalian SCL loci. Genome Research 14(2): 313-318, 2004

A Monte Carlo approach successfully identifies randomness in multiple sequence alignments: a more objective means of data exclusion. Systematic Biology 58(1): 21-34, 2010

MergeAlign: improving multiple sequence alignment performance by dynamic reconstruction of consensus multiple sequence alignments. Bmc Bioinformatics 13(): 117-117, 2012