+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of a formal triage scoring system and a quick-look triage approach

A comparison of a formal triage scoring system and a quick-look triage approach

European Journal of Emergency Medicine 23(3): 185-189

Emergency Department (ED) triage systems have become increasingly comprehensive over time, requiring ever more resources such as nursing time and computer support. There are very few studies that have looked at whether this increased complexity results in improved performance. This study looked at one aspect of performance, comparing reliability of triage nurses' (TNs) triage scores utilizing a simple quick-look method with a commonly used, resource-intense, five-level triage system. This observational study of TNs was carried out in two urban tertiary-care hospital EDs, in real time, assessing patients arriving consecutively. Immediately upon patients' arrival, TNs were asked to assign triage scores based simply on their observation of the patient and the chief complaint. The patient was then triaged in the department's usual way, utilizing a computer-assisted five-level triage system [Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)]. Agreement between scores was quantified. κ scores were calculated, and weighted by the CTAS score. A total of 496 triage assessments were included. Percent agreement between the quick-look method and the standard CTAS method was 84.5%. κ scores were moderately high. Fourteen patients (2.6%), ultimately classified as CTAS 1 or 2, initially received lower scores from TNs using the quick-look method. No comparison of validity was assessed. TNs assigning triage scores to ED patients on arrival, using only chief complaint and observation, were statistically comparable to scores assigned utilizing a resource-intense, comprehensive triage system, but clinically significant discrepancies were identified.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057056668

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25622182

DOI: 10.1097/mej.0000000000000239

Related references

Ability to predict hospitalization and resource requirements: comparison of the 3M Triage Assistance system and the combined Spanish Triage System and Andorran Triage Model. Emergencias 28(1): 21-25, 2016

Comparing triage decisions for the same patients with a five-level and a three-level triage scale: a quick exercise for nurses orienting to triage. Journal of Emergency Nursing: Jen 29(2): 191-192, 2003

An Australian mass casualty incident triage system for the future based upon triage mistakes of the past: the Homebush Triage Standard. Australian and new Zealand Journal of Surgery 69(8): 603-608, 1999

Comparison of prehospital triage and five-level triage system at the emergency department. Emergency Medicine Journal 34(11): 720-725, 2017

Comparison between Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and Taiwan Triage System in emergency departments. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 109(11): 828-837, 2010

#Triage - Formal emergency department triage tools are inefficient, unfair, and they waste time and resources. Cjem 20(5): 665-670, 2018

Comparison of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment system versus the Prehospital Advanced Triage Model in multiple-casualty events. Emergencias 30(4): 224-230, 2018

A pilot study examining the speed and accuracy of triage for simulated disaster patients in an emergency department setting: Comparison of a computerized version of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) methods. Cjem 19(5): 364-371, 2017

Comparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 18(8): 822-829, 2011

The Cape Triage Score: a new triage system South Africa. Proposal from the Cape Triage Group. Emergency Medicine Journal 23(2): 149-153, 2006

Comparison of Canadian triage acuity scale to Australian Emergency Mental Health Scale triage system for psychiatric patients. International Emergency Nursing 23(2): 138-143, 2015

Implications of the emergency department triage environment on triage practice for clients with a mental illness at triage in an Australian context. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal 17(1): 23-29, 2014

Major incident triage and the evaluation of the Triage Sort as a secondary triage method. Emergency Medicine Journal 36(5): 281-286, 2019

Effects of a Web-Based Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Learning Program on Triage Self-Efficacy and Triage Performance Ability for Nurses in Emergency Department. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 49(2): 171-180, 2019

Emergency triage: comparing a novel computer triage program with standard triage. Academic Emergency Medicine 12(6): 502-507, 2005