+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A prospective randomized study to compare systemic emboli using the computer-assisted and conventional techniques of total knee arthroplasty



A prospective randomized study to compare systemic emboli using the computer-assisted and conventional techniques of total knee arthroplasty



Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 97(11): 889-894



Conventional total knee arthroplasty is performed with use of an intramedullary alignment guide, which produces elevated intramedullary pressure that can create fat emboli. Total knee arthroplasty performed via computer-assisted surgery does not require an intramedullary femoral rod, raising the question of whether computer-assisted surgery generates less embolic material than conventional total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the emboli produced in the two techniques. Fifty-seven patients were randomized into two groups: the computer-assisted surgery group (n = 29) and the conventional total knee arthroplasty group (n = 28). An intramedullary femoral alignment jig was used in the conventional total knee arthroplasty group but not in the computer-assisted surgery group. Intraoperative invasive monitoring was performed with use of transesophageal echocardiography and a pulmonary artery catheter. The mean embolic score was 6.21 points for the conventional technique group and 5.48 points for the computer-assisted surgery group (p = 0.0161). After tourniquet deflation, fat emboli were observed in the blood of five patients in the conventional surgery group and one patient in the computer-assisted surgery group. The patients in the computer-assisted surgery group had lower embolic loads compared with the patients in the conventional total knee arthroplasty group. In patients with an uncompromised cardiopulmonary system, the embolic load difference between the techniques was not clinically relevant. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057088463

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26041849

DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.00783


Related references

Fat emboli in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study of computer-assisted navigation vs standard surgical technique. Journal of Arthroplasty 25(7): 1034-1040, 2010

Minimally invasive and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 24(8): 1475-1479, 2014

A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 89(2): 236-243, 2007

Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 90(1): 2-9, 2008

Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study. Knee 21(5): 944-948, 2014

Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared With Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective 9-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Arthroplasty 31(5): 1000-1004, 2016

Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 93(15): 1377-1384, 2011

A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Total and Hidden Blood Loss in Computer-Assisted Surgery and Conventional Surgical Technique of Total Knee Replacement. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 7(2): 211-216, 2015

Comparison of limb and component alignment using computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. Journal of Arthroplasty 22(7): 953-959, 2007

Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Journal of Arthroplasty 21(6): 777-782, 2006

Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial. Journal of Arthroplasty 29(9): 1795-1802, 2014

Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur 87(1): 18-28, 2001

No difference between computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomised study. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 21(10): 2241-2247, 2013

Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 18(10): 1339-1344, 2010

Comparison of total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation versus conventional guiding systems: a prospective study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 17(2): 170-173, 2009