+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A surprisingly poor correlation between in vitro and in vivo testing of biomaterials for bone regeneration: results of a multicentre analysis



A surprisingly poor correlation between in vitro and in vivo testing of biomaterials for bone regeneration: results of a multicentre analysis



European Cells and Materials 31: 312-322



New regenerative materials and approaches need to be assessed through reliable and comparable methods for rapid translation to the clinic. There is a considerable need for proven in vitro assays that are able to reduce the burden on animal testing, by allowing assessment of biomaterial utility predictive of the results currently obtained through in vivo studies. The purpose of this multicentre review was to investigate the correlation between existing in vitro results with in vivo outcomes observed for a range of biomaterials. Members from the European consortium BioDesign, comprising 8 universities in a European multicentre study, provided data from 36 in vivo studies and 47 in vitro assays testing 93 different biomaterials. The outcomes of the in vitro and in vivo experiments were scored according to commonly recognised measures of success relevant to each experiment. The correlation of in vitro with in vivo scores for each assay alone and in combination was assessed. A surprisingly poor correlation between in vitro and in vivo assessments of biomaterials was revealed indicating a clear need for further development of relevant in vitro assays. There was no significant overall correlation between in vitro and in vivo outcome. The mean in vitro scores revealed a trend of covariance to in vivo score with 58 %. The inadequacies of the current in vitro assessments highlighted here further stress the need for the development of novel approaches to in vitro biomaterial testing and validated pre-clinical pipelines.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 057101495

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27215739


Related references

Marrow stromal cell-based cyclooxygenase 2 ex vivo gene-transfer strategy surprisingly lacks bone-regeneration effects and suppresses the bone-regeneration action of bone morphogenetic protein 4 in a mouse critical-sized calvarial defect model. Calcified Tissue International 85(4): 356-367, 2010

Optimizing the correlation between results of testing in vitro and therapeutic outcome in vivo for the fluconazole by testing critical isolates in a murine model of invasive candidiasis. Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 42(1): 129-134, 1998

Optimizing the correlation between results of testing in vitro and therapeutic outcome in vivo for fluconazole by testing critical isolates in a murine model of invasive candidiasis. Antimicrobial Agents and ChemoTherapy 42(1): 129-134, 1998

Bone remodelling in vitro: Where are we headed?: -A review on the current understanding of physiological bone remodelling and inflammation and the strategies for testing biomaterials in vitro. Bone 110: 38-46, 2018

Large-scale bicortical skull bone regeneration using ex vivo replication-defective adenoviral-mediated bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene-transferred bone marrow stromal cells and composite biomaterials. Neurosurgery 65(6 Suppl): 75-81; Discussion 81-3, 2010

Chitosan scaffolds containing calcium phosphate salts and rhBMP-2: in vitro and in vivo testing for bone tissue regeneration. Plos One 9(2): E87149, 2014

In vivo and clinical application of strontium-enriched biomaterials for bone regeneration: A systematic review. Bone and Joint Research 6(6): 366-375, 2017

A multicentre study of acute in vitro cytotoxicity in rat he patocytes: tentative correlation between in vitro toxicities and in vivo data. Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA 21(2): 281-284, 1993

Study on correlation between in vivo and in vitro tests of biomaterials--correlation between leukocyte chemotaxis test and muscular implant test in rabbits. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi 16(3): 263-6, 287, 2003

Endochondral ossification for enhancing bone regeneration: converging native extracellular matrix biomaterials and developmental engineering in vivo. Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews 21(3): 247-266, 2016

Use of tissue culture in predictive testing of drug sensitivity in human ovarian cancer. Correlation between in vitro results and the response in vivo. Neoplasma 29(3): 309-314, 1982

Susceptibility testing of macrolide antibiotics against Haemophilus influenzae and correlation of in vitro results with in vivo efficacy in a mouse septicemia model. Antimicrobial Agents and ChemoTherapy 31(8): 1243-1250, 1987

Response of bone and cartilage cells to biomaterials in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Oral Implantology 19(2): 116-22; Discussion 136-7, 1993

Surprisingly poor correlation among pain scores prior to total hip arthroplasty. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 20(8): 619-621, 2010

In vitro trials with single and co-cultures of osteoblasts and endothelial cells : evaluation of new biomaterials for bone reconstruction and regeneration. Der Orthopade 38(11): 1020-1028, 2010